二胎放开原因英语作文

篇一：英语作文演讲全面放开二胎政策影响

Will the second child policy force the career women return to family

Good evening, everyone. My name is, from school of Maxism. It is my pleasure to join in this competition in this delightful evening. I appreciate the organizers for giving me this opportunity to stand here, discussing the interesting topic. As you are watching, “will the second child policy deprive our jobs?” is a fascinating question proposed by the feminists.

Recently, China government pronounces a new policy that endows the citizens right to have a second child. Abolishment of the single child policy also leads controversies.

The anxiety of “women career crisis” actually comes from the nowadays career status, which shows that it is more difficult for women to get a job compared with men, because employers think the pregnancy will take much time. Therefore, it is salient the feminist will have such worry when they will spend double time in giving birth of two kids. Besides, feminists always deeply believe the second child policy is a kind of contempt on equality, since the policy may treat women as “reproduction machine”.

However, the feminists’ worry enters a logic trap. They don’t treat “reproduction” as the basic human-being’s right, and they actively abandon the basic right. It seems ridiculous some American feminists criticized the Chinese single child policy harshly before, and nowadays they come to question the Chinese single child policy abolishment. It can be seen that there is no single word compelling women to have the second child in the policy. It only endows the people right, not duty. Therefore, the policy doesn’t invade the women willing, so the anxiety of “career crisis” has no meaning.

In all, in my perspective, there is no need to worry about whether the second child policy will deprive our job. Thank you for attending my speech.

篇二：二胎英语作文

New Turning Point of China

范旭东 2012033010022

It is known to all that loosening on the family planning policy decision has been made on the next-phase reform approved by the Third Plenum of the CPC’s 18th central committee which ended on 12,Nov.

However, before the policy was claimed, Chinese leaders thought population emerges as an issue, which should be controlled and approved a law on contraception and abortion .The population growing fast let the government included population control into the national economic development plan and requires government at all levels to increase family-planning work.

With time going by, we discover that one-child policy also has its disadvantage. A growing number of scholars has urged the government to reform the one-child policy ,introduced in the late 1970s to prevent population spiraling out of control, but now regarded by many experts as outdated and harmful to the economy. In recent years ,China ‘s fertility rate maintained at the level of

1.4%----1.5%,much lower than other developing countries .China’s low fertility level will not only lead to a shortage of the aging of the population and the labor force ,but also will reduce the potential growth rate of the economy. In addition , one-child policy makes

many families have only one child ,which makes the child feel lonely during his childhood .

After the policy fully implemented, it will affect 15000000 to 20000000 people in the national scope, among these couples about 50% to 60% would like to have a second children. The estimated number of new policy for infants range from 8000000 to 10000000. So we should pay more attention to who can have a second child and be rational when we choose whether to have a second child. In a word ,only in this way can the population not be a rapid growth in our country.

篇三：二胎 高中英语作文

The second one,should or not?

There is a widespread concern over the issue that whether we should open the second-child policy. Different people hold different attitudes toward the issue.

Some people say we should encourage families to give birth to the second baby. In their view, a family with two kids is more beneficial to children’ development, who can not only feel less lonely ,but also learn to share everything they own so that they can be less selfish. Additionally ,having two children in the family can also ease future pressure on supporting their parents.

While, others differ in their opinions. They argue bringing up children is such a great burden to the family, both mentally and physically. Besides, the family have to spend plenty of energy on their second child. What’s more, some elder children may get hurt, doubting whether his parents love him or not.

Personally, whether we should have the second child or not should be considered fully. If you’re in pressure of living and your first child is not old enough, you’d better concentrate all your energies on your only baby; if everything is ready, you may take the second-child policy into consideration.

篇四：二胎政策英语作文

二胎政策应不应该? Is it Necessary for Two-child Policy?

作者:adreep 来源:互联网 时间:2013-12-16

China is a great country with the largest population in the world. In order to solve the population problem, our government decides to implemented one-child policy. When it is carried out for some time, many people not only see its advantages but also disadvantages. Thus, people argue that two-child policy should be put into effect. In my opinion, two-child policy should be carried out.

中国是一个人口大国。为了解决人口问题，我国政府决定实施独生子女政策。执行一段时间后，许多人不仅看到了这个政策的优点还有缺点。因此，人们开始推崇二胎政策。在我看来，二胎政策是应该实施的。

First of all, two-child policy is the gift for some only child. For some families, maybe the parents are only child and they also can have only child. Put aside the loneliness of their child, when their child grows up and they grow older, their child marry with an only child girl

accidentally, the burden on their child and his wife is unimaginable heavy. Their child and his wife have to take care of two old couples. Usually, a young couple looking after an old couple is a little difficult; if the pressure increasing twice, how can they stand it. But if their parents have two children, they can share the burden of taking care of their parents. It would be much better.

首先，二胎政策对于一些独生子女来说是天赐的礼物。对于一些家庭来说，也许父母都是独生子女，而他们也只生一个孩子。抛开孩子的孤独不说，当他们的孩子长大了，而他们也变老了，他们的孩子又和一个独生子女结婚，这样的话,压在他们孩子和孩子妻子肩上的压力是不可想象的。他们的孩子和他的妻子不得不照顾两对老人。通常，一对年轻的夫妇照顾一对老人就有点难了；如果压力增加了一倍，他们怎么能忍受呢。但是如果他们的父母有两个孩子，他们就能分享照顾父母的压力。这样会比较好。

Secondly, two-child policy can guarantee the number of Chinese population. As the widely spread of one-child policy, some people have changed their conception about giving birth. If they firmly believe one-child policy, there will be more and more the dink. After several decades, our country will famous for lack of population.

其次，二胎政策可以确保中国的人口数量。由于广泛宣传独生子女政策，有些人已经改变了他们的生育观念。如果他们认同独生子女政策，就会有越老越多的丁克族。几十年后，我国就会以人口短缺而著名了。

In conclusion, one-child policy has out of date. And tow-child policy is needed and necessary. It can solve the problem of nowadays and the future. 总之，独生子女政策已经过时了。二胎政策是必要和必须的。这可以解决当前和未来的问题。

篇五：全面放开二胎政策的原因

全面放开二胎政策的原因

全面放开二胎政策的原因一：“低生育陷阱”——总和生育率远低于更替水平 中国社会科学院发布的《经济蓝皮书：2015年中国经济形势分析与预测》认为，中国目前的总和生育率只有1.4，远低于更替水平2.1，已经非常接近国际上公认的1.3的“低生育陷阱”。

虽然也有专家表示中国已经进入“低生育率陷阱”没有根据，但不可否认的是：人口是一个国家竞争力的基本要素。没了人口红利，在竞争力上就少了一枚盾牌。（“人口红利”简单通俗地理解为：由于年轻人口数量增多形成的廉价劳动力，提供给经济发展相对便宜的要素价格。对于很多发展中国家而言，廉价劳动力是发展的一个重要要素。）

深入的经济学分析和实证研究都表明，在扣除技术进步和城镇化的作用外，人口衰减带来的将是人均GDP下降。如果不信的话，看看邻国——日本：长期低生育率被认为是日本经济长达20多年的停滞的根本原因。

全面放开二胎政策的原因二：“银发危机”——老年人养老成问题 从人口结构上看，现在中国的老年人口比例在不断上升，从2010年13.3%提高到2014年的15.5%。目前，中国已成为人口老龄化发展速度最快的国家之一，老人生活旅居问题也在不断凸显出来。

据联合国统计，到本世纪中期，中国将有近5亿人口超过60岁，而这个数字将超过美国人口总数。这就提出了一个严肃的课题：出生率降低，年轻人越来越少，今后谁来工作、谁来纳税、谁来养活数以亿计的老年人？

全面放开二胎政策的原因三：“刘易斯拐点”隐忧——劳动力过剩向短缺转折 从目前的现状来看，低生育率和老龄化是中国经济刘易斯拐点提前出现的关键诱因。（“刘易斯拐点”，即劳动力过剩向短缺的转折点，由诺贝尔经济学奖获得者威廉·阿瑟·刘易斯在1968年提出。它指的是在工业化进程中，随着农村富余劳动力向非农产业的逐步转移，农村富余劳动力逐渐减少，人口红利慢慢消失，最终枯竭。）

与“刘易斯拐点”相对应的是“人口红利”。

改革开放以来，中国经济保持了高速的增长，大量的富余农村劳动力涌入城市，在催生经济快速发展的同时，也导致了目前农村问题频发。以“老弱病残”为主的农村人口结构已逐步凸显了农村经济的增长乏力。

中国社会科学院人口与劳动经济研究所所长蔡昉在2014年两会期间接受记者采访时表示：2004年开始民工荒，从沿海城市迅速蔓延到内地，此后再没有停止过，工资从那个时候开始上涨，也没有再停止过，而且是低端劳动者工资上涨。所以2004年肯定是一个起点。如果说区间的话，我们可以看到，2010年开始，中国15岁到59岁的劳动年龄人口出现负增长。这是一个巨大的转折，劳动年龄人口增长不是减慢了，而是一路负增长下去了，所以让我说一个区间，就是从2004年到2010年，

这个区间总共才6年，但是这个区间在日本走了30年，在韩国走了40年，中国还是很快的。

全面放开二胎政策的原因四：“失独”社会之殇——独生子女家庭丧子之痛令人深思

近些年来，我国家庭规模不断缩小，从1982年的4.43人缩减至2010年的

3.10人，独生子女家庭超过1.5亿户，家庭的生育、养老等基本功能有所弱化。许多独生子女面对沉重的养老负担，常感到有心无力、独木难支，而老人“失独”不仅是家庭灾难，也是社会之殇。

今年7月19日，杭州失独老夫妻在女儿去世百日祭双双自杀的消息令大家心痛不已，同时也不禁深思：中国第一代独生子女政策家庭逐渐步入老年，失独家庭成为一类社会创伤。失独家庭所经历的心理创伤、经济压力、医疗养老问题超过一般家庭丧子后承受的痛苦，而这份痛苦谁能解？

全面放开二胎政策的原因五：男女比例失衡——三个因素共同作用的结果 下图为《中国历年男女出生比例》表。按照该图，我们可以将1950到2014的64年时间划分为4个时期，而每个时期的男女出生比例都与背后的经济社会和政策因素变化相符。

计划生育政策自1980年开始强化，这分别体现为城市的普遍“一胎”和农村的普遍“一胎半”政策。在重男轻女思想依然普遍和B超逐渐普及的情况下，可能促使男女出生比例节节升高，从1980年的107.4上升到2004年的121.1。

政府自2002年开始“治理”男女比例失调的问题，具体措施包括明文严格禁止使用B超等技术进行胎儿性别鉴定。此外，随着城市化的提升和农村生育观念的改变，对男孩的偏好也可能进一步淡化。与之对应，男女出生比例自2004年达到峰值的121.1之后，整体上开始下降，但到2014年依然处于115.9的超高位。

男女比例失调是性别偏好、生育数量限制和胎儿性别鉴定三个因素共同作用的结果，缺一不可。重男轻女的观念虽然已经淡化，但依然会长期存在;禁止胎儿性别鉴定技术也不可能完全有效。因此，要使男女比例恢复正常，有效的办法就是全面取消生育限制政策。

以上几个原因迫在眉睫，促使着二胎政策能够全面放开！

小学作文