作业帮好心没好报的事例
来源：学生作业帮助网 编辑：作业帮 时间：2024/11/14 07:11:20 作文素材
篇一：好心没好报
好心没好报
提问1：如果为了利益而帮助他人，这叫好心吗？
案列1：诚实守信的人永远不会去骗别人，却有可能成为被骗者；善良的人永远不会去伤害别人，却很容易受到伤害；那些见义勇为献出宝贵生命的英雄，留给亲人的却是无尽的痛苦和思念，这难道就是所谓的好报？
案列2：我的同桌今天早上很不开心，一直趴在课桌上一声不吭，我就打算去帮帮他，可是当我才问他第一句时，他竟然骂我多管闲事。这难道也是好报？ 案列3：农夫和蛇，东郭先生和狼的故事
案列4：南京的彭宇被一位老太太告上法庭，称其撞到自己，要求赔偿十几万元的损失。彭宇好心帮助那位老太太，将其扶起送去医院，却反被巫。这就是所谓的好报？
总结陈词：好人好报总是人们一个唯心的愿望，我们也可称其为是一个良好的愿望，当这一愿望不加区分的付诸行动时，其结果往往适得其反。农夫和蛇，东郭先生和狼的故事就是很好的例证，其实现实生活也是如此。我们当然愿意做好人，也赞赏助人为乐，但我们不承认好心就有好报。南京的彭宇好心扶起一位摔倒的老太太，结果被判罚十三万余元的赔款。类似的事时有发生，件件昭示着好人没好报。
篇二：好心没好报
好心没好报（原创。小小说）
还是“二月二龙抬头”过节时吃的饺子。
文方妈真想再好好吃一顿。虽说肉贵，手头紧点儿，可也不是吃不起。再说今天闺女来瞧娘，女婿不来，不弄个酒菜啥的，也得包顿饺子不是。吃过早饭，她就匆匆揣上10元钱，站到大街上专等串乡卖肉的。
“哟，大嫂，站这儿东张西望的，接财神呀！”
文方妈回头一看，慌忙迎了过去：“他二婶儿，啥时候回来啦？”
“ 昨天。这不清明嘛，都回来烧烧纸，下午可都走了。我明儿再走。我也没出息，一到咱这老家，就不想走啦！哎，你这是干啥？来俺家坐会儿吧！”一身珠光宝气的二婶很亲热。
“凑空儿一定去。今儿小花来，我寻思着割点儿肉，包顿饺子。”
“大嫂，那你就甭割了。我这儿昨日弄的馅，还多呢。你拿个盆儿倒走算了”
“那哪中，您也是花钱买的。”文方妈一脸的谦恭。
“你跟我还见外？拿盆儿去！”二婶亲切的命令道。
文方妈感激地连声说：“那中，那中……”
……
当文方妈从二婶家出来时，双手捧着满满的一小盆饺子馅，脸上笑成了一朵花：“甭送啦，家里有啥活儿，你就说一声，咱文方有的是力气……”
二婶很客气地说：“大嫂，那我就不送了，注意脚底下……”
“中，中！你回吧！”
“吱――”身后的大铁门关上了。
“乖乖，来，叫我抱抱。”隔墙传来了二婶的声音。文方妈知道，这是二婶在招呼她的小白狗：“你就作吧你！纯肉馅你都不吃。乖乖，是想喝奶吗？走，喝奶去――”
文方妈突然踉跄了几步，手里的磁盆几乎掉下，她却顺势一摔，抹着眼泪走了。
听见响声，二婶开了门。见状吓了一跳，急忙喊叫：“大嫂，大嫂，摔着了吗……”然而任她怎么叫喊，文方妈却一声不应，连头也不回。
好心的二婶捶着自己的胸口：“你这是干啥，好心没好报哇！”
篇三：为什么好心没好报-
为什么好心没好报?
When Kent M. Keith was a Cub Scout in the 1950s, he had a great urge to do good deeds and pile up merit badges. Was it altruism? Ambition? A chance to feel better about himself? Was he really making a difference?
One day, his father set him straight. 'Kent,' he said, 'don't help the old lady cross the street unless she wants to go.'
Kent Keith, now 61, is CEO of the Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership, a nonprofit organization based in Westfield, Ind., that trains and advises groups and individuals on practical and ethical ways of helping others. Most of us want to be effective, he says, 'to make the world better. But before you help people, you have to ask them, 'What do you need? What do you want?''
Every day, we see reminders of the limitations, and even the dangers, of good intentions. In Haiti, U.S. missionaries who said they only wanted to save orphaned children ended up arrested on child-trafficking charges. In Asian countries hit by the 2004 tsunami, residents still shake their heads over the warehouses filled with unusable donations, including winter coats and stiletto shoes. And earthquake-ravaged Chile is sure to receive its share of 'useless aid' in the days ahead.
The steady procession of such stories would have us believing the old axiom that 'no good deed goes unpunished.' How can we better calibrate good intentions in our own lives?
The answer, from activists and academics who study the human impulse, is blunt. Throw out any ideas of winning praise for your work-be honest, most of us want to be stroked-and build up some armor to take hits. A growing field of organizations has sprung up to advise people looking to donate, time or money, to help potential donors achieve these steps.
'Throw away your assumptions about what people need,' advises Tori Hogan, a 27-year-old activist who has traveled the world studying the
effectiveness of aid programs. Beyond Good Intentions, the Cambridge, Mass.-based charity-watchdog organization she founded, posts videos on its Web site that evaluate aid projects.
Ms. Hogan tells of going to a village in Peru where an aid group brought in tourists to help build public toilets. The group ran out of money and time, the tourists ended their volunteering vacations, and the toilets
were never completed. The aid group had thought access to restroom facilities was needed to boost living standards, Ms. Hogan says. 'But when I asked people in the community what they wanted, they said, 'What we really needed was irrigation, and to have our bridge fixed, so we could take our goods to market.''
The never-completed toilets were gaping holes that had to be covered. Villagers feared their children would fall in.
Such failed efforts are often repeated across the developing world, and some aid workers resent it when Ms. Hogan points them out. Too bad, she says. As she sees it, it is irresponsible to believe that as long as we mean well, the details will figure themselves out. It's no excuse to say: 'Well, at least my heart was in the right place.'
It isn't always true that any help is better than no help. 'We see a lot of people coming to orphanages, attaching to kids, and they're gone in a week,' says Ms. Hogan.
In one of the Beyond Good Intentions videos, a woman who runs an orphanage in Argentina explains that when these short-term volunteers say goodbye, the orphans 'are left feeling empty.' Now, as soon as volunteers arrive, wary orphans often ask, 'How long are you here for?' Says Ms. Hogan: 'They're tired of having their hearts broken.'
In San Antonio, Jon Hansbrough received a parking ticket last year while briefly parked in a commercial loading zone. A church volunteer, he was delivering meals for a homeless shelter. He says the officer who issued the ticket told him he should have parked down the block and somehow carted the 500 pounds of food to the shelter.
At first, Mr. Hansbrough, a 66-year-old disabled veteran, was upset, and called on fellow parishioners 'to pray that public officials will develop compassion for the homeless and tolerance for those who feed them.' Being 'Punished'
But on reflection, he chose not to dwell on the fact that he was 'punished' while doing good. Instead, he now stays with his sport-utility vehicle in case an officer shows up, while some of the homeless men quickly unload the food. 'I'm answering to a higher calling,' he says.
Michael Grayson, who survived a more serious example of being 'punished' for a good deed, feels the same way. Last December, the 51-year-old
carpenter from Jacksonville, Fla., stopped along a roadway to help an 87-year-old woman whose car wouldn't start.
Mr. Grayson slid underneath her car, got it running by jumping the starter, but didn't realize the woman had left the car in drive. The car began to move and both the front and back tires rolled across him, crushing multiple bones. He has no insurance, and his medical bills now stand at $148,000. Medicaid and the woman's auto insurance have covered only a fraction of that amount, and his doctors expect him to be in a wheelchair until June. Still, Mr. Grayson says he has no regrets about helping that woman, and no hard feelings toward her. The lesson for him isn't that no good deed goes unpunished. Rather, he says, the lesson is to be more careful. 'I should have checked that the car was in park, and I should have blocked the tires before getting under the car,' he says.
He hopes his predicament won't dissuade anyone from following through on good intentions. 'Do all you can for other people,' he says. 'That's what makes the world go round.'
上世纪50年代，肯特?基斯(Kent M. Keith)曾经参加过幼年童子军(Cub Scout)，那时他非常希望多做好事，多拿奖章。他这种行为是因为乐于助人，还是出于野心，又或者是为了让自己感觉更好？他的所做所为是否真的带来了改变？
一天，父亲纠正了他的想法。父亲说，肯特，要是老婆婆自己不想过街就别硬搀着人家。
现年61岁的基斯是印第安纳州Westfield非营利组织“格林里夫服务型领导力中心”(Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership)的CEO。这家组织就怎样以讲求实效、合乎道德的方式帮助他人向团体和个人提供培训及咨询。
他说，我们多数人都想尽力让世界变得更好，但在帮助别人以前，你得问问他们需要什么、想得到什么。
每天都有一些事例让我们看到，善意有其
要是这样的故事不断上演，我们就会对“好心没好报”这句老话信以为真了。那么在我们自己的生活中，怎样才能更好地拿捏自己的善意呢？
活动人士和研究人类动机的学者给出的答案直截了当。那就是丢掉任何为了赢得赞美而做好事的想法──说实话，我们多数人都想听到溢美之辞──并准备好承
受打击。已经有一些组织如雨后春笋般涌现，为那些希望出力或捐钱的人提供咨询，以帮助潜在的捐赠者实现这两个步骤。
曾在世界各地研究各种援助项目有效性的27岁活动家多莉?霍根(Tori Hogan)说，对于人们需要什么，你得摒弃先入为主的想法。她在马萨诸塞州剑桥市创办了慈善监督组织“善意背后”(Beyond Good Intentions)，这家组织在自己的网站上发布评估各种援助项目的视频。
霍根讲起，她曾前往秘鲁的一个村庄，在那里，一家援助团体把游客带进来帮助修建公共厕所。最终这家团体耗尽了时间和资金，游客们结束了他们做志愿活动的假期，而厕所却一直没有完工。霍根说，援助团体以为公共厕所是提高生活标准所必需的，但我问当地人他们需要什么时，他们说，我们真正需要的是灌溉设施，以及把桥修好，方便我们把货物拿到市场上去卖。
未完工的厕所成了一个个大洞，必须填起来。村民们担心他们的孩子掉进去。 这种失策之举在发展中国家屡见不鲜，而当霍根指出来时，一些援助人员还颇感不快。她说，这样实在糟糕。她认为，以为只要用意是好的就行了，细节问题不用管，这样的想法很不负责任。“至少我是好心”这种话是绝对说不过去的。 有人帮忙总比没人帮忙强？其实也不一定。霍根说，我们看到很多人来到孤儿院和孩子们接触，但是过了一星期就音信全无。
在“善意背后”的一个视频中，阿根廷一家孤儿院的女性负责人讲解说，当这些短期志愿者离开后，孤儿们会觉得空虚。现在，志愿者们一到，警惕的孤儿们常常会问，你们会在这里呆多久？霍根说，他们不想总是伤心。
圣安东尼奥市的教会志愿者乔恩?汉斯布鲁(Jon Hansbrough)去年在一个商用装卸区短暂停车的时候，收到了一份违规停车罚单。当时他是在为一家无家可归者收容所送饭。他说，开罚单的警察告诉他，应该把车停在街区另一头，然后想办法用手推车把500磅重的食品送到收容所。
起初，66岁的残疾老兵汉斯布鲁觉得难过，他呼吁教区其他居民“祈祷公务人员培养出对无家可归者的同情，和对施食者的宽容”。
行善遭遇“恶报”
但经过反思，他决定不再老是纠结于做好事反遭“恶报”的想法。相反，汉斯布鲁现在是呆在自己的SUV里以备警察出现，同时让一些无家可归者快速卸载食品。他说：“我在回应一种更高的要求。”
迈克尔?格雷森(Michael Grayson)拥有一次更加严重的因行善而遭遇“恶报”的经历，他现在的想法也和汉斯布鲁一样。格雷森来自佛罗里达州，现年51岁，是一位木工。去年12月，他在马路上看到一位87岁老太太的车无法启动，于是停车去帮她。
格雷森钻到她车底下，通过外接电力给车打着火。但他没有意识到老太太在没有把车熄火的情况下离开了汽车。车辆开始移动，前后轮都辗过格雷森的身体，造成他多处骨折。他没有保险，目前的医疗费用达到了148,000美元。“Medicaid”医疗补助计划和老太太的车险只覆盖了很小的一部分，医生预计他直到6月份才能离开轮椅。
但格雷森说，他对帮助这位老太太一点也不后悔，对她也没有任何怨恨。他说，自己从中汲取的教训并不是“好心没好报”，而是要更加小心。他说，我当时应该确认车已经熄火，并且应该是挡住轮胎后再钻到车底下去。
他希望自己的遭遇不会影响任何人坚持行善。他说，要尽你所能帮助别人，这样世界才能正常运转。
篇四：为什么好心没好报-
为什么好心没好报?
When Kent M. Keith was a Cub Scout in the 1950s, he had a great urge to do good deeds and pile up merit badges. Was it altruism? Ambition? A chance to feel better about himself? Was he really making a difference?
One day, his father set him straight. 'Kent,' he said, 'don't help the old lady cross the street unless she wants to go.'
Kent Keith, now 61, is CEO of the Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership, a nonprofit organization based in Westfield, Ind., that trains and advises groups and individuals on practical and ethical ways of helping others. Most of us want to be effective, he says, 'to make the world better. But before you help people, you have to ask them, 'What do you need? What do you want?''
Every day, we see reminders of the limitations, and even the dangers, of good intentions. In Haiti, U.S. missionaries who said they only wanted to save orphaned children ended up arrested on child-trafficking charges. In Asian countries hit by the 2004 tsunami, residents still shake their heads over the warehouses filled with unusable donations, including winter coats and stiletto shoes. And earthquake-ravaged Chile is sure to receive its share of 'useless aid' in the days ahead.
The steady procession of such stories would have us believing the old axiom that 'no good deed goes unpunished.' How can we better calibrate good intentions in our own lives?
The answer, from activists and academics who study the human impulse, is blunt. Throw out any ideas of winning praise for your work-be honest, most of us want to be stroked-and build up some armor to take hits. A growing field of organizations has sprung up to advise people looking to donate, time or money, to help potential donors achieve these steps.
'Throw away your assumptions about what people need,' advises Tori Hogan, a 27-year-old activist who has traveled the world studying the
effectiveness of aid programs. Beyond Good Intentions, the Cambridge, Mass.-based charity-watchdog organization she founded, posts videos on its Web site that evaluate aid projects.
Ms. Hogan tells of going to a village in Peru where an aid group brought in tourists to help build public toilets. The group ran out of money and time, the tourists ended their volunteering vacations, and the toilets
were never completed. The aid group had thought access to restroom facilities was needed to boost living standards, Ms. Hogan says. 'But when I asked people in the community what they wanted, they said, 'What we really needed was irrigation, and to have our bridge fixed, so we could take our goods to market.''
The never-completed toilets were gaping holes that had to be covered. Villagers feared their children would fall in.
Such failed efforts are often repeated across the developing world, and some aid workers resent it when Ms. Hogan points them out. Too bad, she says. As she sees it, it is irresponsible to believe that as long as we mean well, the details will figure themselves out. It's no excuse to say: 'Well, at least my heart was in the right place.'
It isn't always true that any help is better than no help. 'We see a lot of people coming to orphanages, attaching to kids, and they're gone in a week,' says Ms. Hogan.
In one of the Beyond Good Intentions videos, a woman who runs an orphanage in Argentina explains that when these short-term volunteers say goodbye, the orphans 'are left feeling empty.' Now, as soon as volunteers arrive, wary orphans often ask, 'How long are you here for?' Says Ms. Hogan: 'They're tired of having their hearts broken.'
In San Antonio, Jon Hansbrough received a parking ticket last year while briefly parked in a commercial loading zone. A church volunteer, he was delivering meals for a homeless shelter. He says the officer who issued the ticket told him he should have parked down the block and somehow carted the 500 pounds of food to the shelter.
At first, Mr. Hansbrough, a 66-year-old disabled veteran, was upset, and called on fellow parishioners 'to pray that public officials will develop compassion for the homeless and tolerance for those who feed them.' Being 'Punished'
But on reflection, he chose not to dwell on the fact that he was 'punished' while doing good. Instead, he now stays with his sport-utility vehicle in case an officer shows up, while some of the homeless men quickly unload the food. 'I'm answering to a higher calling,' he says.
Michael Grayson, who survived a more serious example of being 'punished' for a good deed, feels the same way. Last December, the 51-year-old
carpenter from Jacksonville, Fla., stopped along a roadway to help an 87-year-old woman whose car wouldn't start.
Mr. Grayson slid underneath her car, got it running by jumping the starter, but didn't realize the woman had left the car in drive. The car began to move and both the front and back tires rolled across him, crushing multiple bones. He has no insurance, and his medical bills now stand at $148,000. Medicaid and the woman's auto insurance have covered only a fraction of that amount, and his doctors expect him to be in a wheelchair until June. Still, Mr. Grayson says he has no regrets about helping that woman, and no hard feelings toward her. The lesson for him isn't that no good deed goes unpunished. Rather, he says, the lesson is to be more careful. 'I should have checked that the car was in park, and I should have blocked the tires before getting under the car,' he says.
He hopes his predicament won't dissuade anyone from following through on good intentions. 'Do all you can for other people,' he says. 'That's what makes the world go round.'
上世纪50年代，肯特?基斯(Kent M. Keith)曾经参加过幼年童子军(Cub Scout)，那时他非常希望多做好事，多拿奖章。他这种行为是因为乐于助人，还是出于野心，又或者是为了让自己感觉更好？他的所做所为是否真的带来了改变？
一天，父亲纠正了他的想法。父亲说，肯特，要是老婆婆自己不想过街就别硬搀着人家。
现年61岁的基斯是印第安纳州Westfield非营利组织“格林里夫服务型领导力中心”(Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership)的CEO。这家组织就怎样以讲求实效、合乎道德的方式帮助他人向团体和个人提供培训及咨询。
他说，我们多数人都想尽力让世界变得更好，但在帮助别人以前，你得问问他们需要什么、想得到什么。
每天都有一些事例让我们看到，善意有其局限甚至是危险。在海地，一些美国传教士声称自己只想拯救孤儿，结果却因拐卖儿童的指控而被捕。在2004年海啸中受灾的亚洲国家，许多仓库里充塞着各种用不上的捐赠品──比如说冬装大衣和细高跟鞋，当地居民对此只能无奈摇头。受地震袭击的智利接下来肯定也会收到各种“无用援助”。
要是这样的故事不断上演，我们就会对“好心没好报”这句老话信以为真了。那么在我们自己的生活中，怎样才能更好地拿捏自己的善意呢？
活动人士和研究人类动机的学者给出的答案直截了当。那就是丢掉任何为了赢得赞美而做好事的想法──说实话，我们多数人都想听到溢美之辞──并准备好承
受打击。已经有一些组织如雨后春笋般涌现，为那些希望出力或捐钱的人提供咨询，以帮助潜在的捐赠者实现这两个步骤。
曾在世界各地研究各种援助项目有效性的27岁活动家多莉?霍根(Tori Hogan)说，对于人们需要什么，你得摒弃先入为主的想法。她在马萨诸塞州剑桥市创办了慈善监督组织“善意背后”(Beyond Good Intentions)，这家组织在自己的网站上发布评估各种援助项目的视频。
霍根讲起，她曾前往秘鲁的一个村庄，在那里，一家援助团体把游客带进来帮助修建公共厕所。最终这家团体耗尽了时间和资金，游客们结束了他们做志愿活动的假期，而厕所却一直没有完工。霍根说，援助团体以为公共厕所是提高生活标准所必需的，但我问当地人他们需要什么时，他们说，我们真正需要的是灌溉设施，以及把桥修好，方便我们把货物拿到市场上去卖。
未完工的厕所成了一个个大洞，必须填起来。村民们担心他们的孩子掉进去。 这种失策之举在发展中国家屡见不鲜，而当霍根指出来时，一些援助人员还颇感不快。她说，这样实在糟糕。她认为，以为只要用意是好的就行了，细节问题不用管，这样的想法很不负责任。“至少我是好心”这种话是绝对说不过去的。 有人帮忙总比没人帮忙强？其实也不一定。霍根说，我们看到很多人来到孤儿院和孩子们接触，但是过了一星期就音信全无。
在“善意背后”的一个视频中，阿根廷一家孤儿院的女性负责人讲解说，当这些短期志愿者离开后，孤儿们会觉得空虚。现在，志愿者们一到，警惕的孤儿们常常会问，你们会在这里呆多久？霍根说，他们不想总是伤心。
圣安东尼奥市的教会志愿者乔恩?汉斯布鲁(Jon Hansbrough)去年在一个商用装卸区短暂停车的时候，收到了一份违规停车罚单。当时他是在为一家无家可归者收容所送饭。他说，开罚单的警察告诉他，应该把车停在街区另一头，然后想办法用手推车把500磅重的食品送到收容所。
起初，66岁的残疾老兵汉斯布鲁觉得难过，他呼吁教区其他居民“祈祷公务人员培养出对无家可归者的同情，和对施食者的宽容”。
行善遭遇“恶报”
但经过反思，他决定不再老是纠结于做好事反遭“恶报”的想法。相反，汉斯布鲁现在是呆在自己的SUV里以备警察出现，同时让一些无家可归者快速卸载食品。他说：“我在回应一种更高的要求。”
迈克尔?格雷森(Michael Grayson)拥有一次更加严重的因行善而遭遇“恶报”的经历，他现在的想法也和汉斯布鲁一样。格雷森来自佛罗里达州，现年51岁，是一位木工。去年12月，他在马路上看到一位87岁老太太的车无法启动，于是停车去帮她。
格雷森钻到她车底下，通过外接电力给车打着火。但他没有意识到老太太在没有把车熄火的情况下离开了汽车。车辆开始移动，前后轮都辗过格雷森的身体，造成他多处骨折。他没有保险，目前的医疗费用达到了148,000美元。“Medicaid”医疗补助计划和老太太的车险只覆盖了很小的一部分，医生预计他直到6月份才能离开轮椅。
但格雷森说，他对帮助这位老太太一点也不后悔，对她也没有任何怨恨。他说，自己从中汲取的教训并不是“好心没好报”，而是要更加小心。他说，我当时应该确认车已经熄火，并且应该是挡住轮胎后再钻到车底下去。
他希望自己的遭遇不会影响任何人坚持行善。他说，要尽你所能帮助别人，这样世界才能正常运转。
篇五：好心没有好报
好心没有好报
今年我任六年级的班主任及语文教师,感觉好辛苦,可学生一点也不理解老师的苦。我也是因为服从分配才教他们的，可今天让我好生气。
今天早上，我的语文课是第一和第二节课。我刚上完第一节课时，在课间十分钟，校长走进我的教室，对我说今天早上的数学与微机课老师有事，下边两节课也是你上了。其实我一点都不喜欢占用别位老师的课，我也很体谅学生的，一早上四节课，总面对一位老师，一写很烦。我也再想该怎样分配时间，让学生觉得上课不累。
可就在我思考中时，第二节课就下课了，我把下两节课也是我上的事婉转的说给学生听。有部分学生平时看他反映差极了，可这个时候他最能发挥特长了。就说上微机课去了，当时我什么都不说，让他们尽兴的玩。等上课时，我就问刚才说要去上微机课的同学自觉站起来。有一个学生还算诚实，主动站起来，可有位学生多次都不是主动的那种，学习在班上倒每次拿“第一”，此人户口还不在本地，可他一点不懂得尊敬别人，让我忍无可忍。可我还是承住气，只是批评了他，我说你们俩个很特殊，要上微机课自己去上吧，人缘好的话让微机老师给你们开小灶吧，我倒没那么大的本事给你俩开小灶，如果你们俩不比别人特殊的话，那就上语文课吧。他们也没敢说什么，只好乖乖的上语文课。
还有一个更离谱的，说走逃课，还讲了让我听见。我看见他是在座位上讲的，我就接着说，逃吧，男子汉说话要算话，有本事一个学期都逃，我来叫你都别来。等我来叫你时，你就说——别再来叫我了，我不喜欢上语文课，也不喜欢在教室里呆着，我喜欢自由自在的生活。叫你几次你都别来。再说你们考的那二三十分，不来上也不会影响你们考试的成绩的。他被我几句说的话都不会回了，说不是他讲的。可我用眼睛瞪着他，他就没敢狡辩了。
今天我恰恰上的是《跨越百年的美丽》，学生说美丽是奉献。我说是啊，可我今天为你们奉献的两节课，可你们还是不理解教师。让老师伤啊，好心没好报，不过我现在看出你们还是理解老师的付出是为你们好，我也兴许好受一些了，希望下次别再有墙头草了。
作文素材