翻译一段文章（拒绝机翻）,汉译英（不必一字一句的翻译,不过越全愈好）专家小组的结论和建议：1．专家小组的结论是：①巴西对国产飞机出口给予的PROEX利率平衡补贴是《反补贴协议》

翻译一段文章（拒绝机翻）,汉译英（不必一字一句的翻译,不过越全愈好）专家小组的结论和建议：1．专家小组的结论是：①巴西对国产飞机出口给予的PROEX利率平衡补贴是《反补贴协议》
翻译一段文章（拒绝机翻）,汉译英
（不必一字一句的翻译,不过越全愈好）专家小组的结论和建议：
1．专家小组的结论是：
①巴西对国产飞机出口给予的PROEX利率平衡补贴是《反补贴协议》第1条里所内涵的补贴,补贴视该协议第3条第1款（a）里所规定的出口实绩而定.
②巴西PROEX对国产飞机出口给予的利率平衡补贴不是《反补贴协议》附录一出口补贴说明一览表K项第一段里所内涵的“许可”补贴.
③巴西没有遵循《反补贴协议》第27条第4款行事,因此该协议第3条第1款（a）关于“被禁止的补贴”适用于巴西.
专家小组因此认为,巴西根据PROEX计划对国产飞机出口给予利率平衡补贴是一种出口补贴,这与《反补贴协议》第3条是不一致的.
按照《谅解》第3条第8款,上述PROEX利率平衡补贴损害了加拿大的利益,对此,巴西没有驳回.
2．专家小组的建议：
加拿大要求专家小组就调查结果的落实作出具体的建议.然而专家小组认为要根据《反补贴协议》第4条第7款作出建议,而不是其他.因此专家小组建议巴西立即撤销上面提及的补贴.
《反补贴协议》第4条第7款规定“专家小组在其建议中应指定一个必须撤销补贴的时间期限,如果该补贴被认定是一种被禁止的补贴”.在专家小组指定“立即”撤销补贴的时间期限时,可能会考虑补贴的性质以及执行建议的困难.然而专家小组在实际指定“撤销”补贴采取步骤方面缺乏经验,专家小组不会考虑去命令巴西在执行专家小组的建议时要采取什么步骤.因此,专家小组一方面考虑到补贴的性质以及对于巴西在执行建议时会采取什么程序；另一方面要求巴西“立即”撤销补贴,最后断定巴西应在90日内撤销.

翻译一段文章（拒绝机翻）,汉译英（不必一字一句的翻译,不过越全愈好）专家小组的结论和建议：1．专家小组的结论是：①巴西对国产飞机出口给予的PROEX利率平衡补贴是《反补贴协议》
A.The Conclusions of the Panel of Experts are:
1.The PROEX equilibrium rate of interest subsidy provided by Brazil to the export of local manufactured airplanes is similar to the subsidy referred to in Article 1 of the ‘Anti-subsidy Agreement’; the rate of subsidy is based on the actual export amount specified in Article 3 Clause 1(a) of the said Agreement.
2.The equilibrium rate of interest subsidy provided by Brazil PROEX to the export of local manufactured airplanes is not the ‘permissible’ subsidy referred to in the first paragraph of item K on the Description of Export Subsidy Schedule,an Appendix of the ‘Anti-subsidy Agreement’
3.Brazil did not act in accordance with Article 27 Clause 4 of the ‘Anti-subsidy Agreement’,consequently,Article 3 Clause1(a) of the said Agreement concerning ‘Prohibited Subsidy’ can be applied to Brazil.
Therefore,it is the opinion of the Panel that the equilibrium rate of interest subsidy provided by Brazil to the export of local manufactured airplanes according to the PROEX plan is a form of export subsidy,which is in contradiction to Article 3 of the ‘Anti-subsidy Agreement’.
In accordance with Article 3 Clause 8 of the “MOU”,the PROEX equilibrium rate of interest subsidy has damaged the interests of Canada.Brazil did not rebut the conclusion.
B.Proposal by the Panel of Experts
Canada has requested the Panel to present a specific proposal based on the conclusions of the investigation.However,the Panel feels that the proposal should be made in accordance with none other than Article 4 Clause 7 of the ‘Anti-subsidy Agreement’.Therefore,the Panel recommends that Brazil immediately withdraws the above-mentioned subsidy.
Article 4 Clause 7 of the ‘Anti-subsidy Agreement’ states:‘The proposal of the Panel shall stipulate a time limit for the withdrawal of a subsidy which has been found to be a prohibited subsidy’.When the Panel sets the time limit for the ‘immediate’ withdrawal of the subsidy,it may consider the nature of the subsidy and the difficulties in executing the proposal.However,the Panel of Experts lacks the relevant experience in the actual implementing procedures,so the Panel will not consider including any specific procedures in the proposal to Brazil.Therefore,in consideration of the nature of the subsidy and the procedures adopted by Brazil in the execution of the proposal on one hand,and the demand for Brazil to ‘immediately’ withdraw the subsidy on the other hand,the time limit of the withdrawal is subsequently fixed at within 90 days.

哇``你做什么的啊，好象是联合国的人Does not need translation every single word or phrase, but more completely recovers from an illness) technical panel's conclusion and suggested: 1. technical panel's conclusion is: ①...

全部展开

哇``你做什么的啊，好象是联合国的人Does not need translation every single word or phrase, but more completely recovers from an illness) technical panel's conclusion and suggested: 1. technical panel's conclusion is: ①Brazil the PROEX interest rate balanced subsidy which gives to the domestically produced airplane export is "Counter-Subsidy Agreement" the 1st in connotation subsidy, the subsidy regards the export performance which this agreement 3rd 1st section (a) in stipulated to decide. ②Brazilian PROEX the interest rate balanced subsidy which gives to the domestically produced airplane export is not "Counter-Subsidy Agreement" the appendix export subsidy explanation data sheet K first section in connotation “permits” the subsidy. ③Brazil has not followed "Counter-Subsidy Agreement" the 27th 4th section of conduct, therefore this agreement 3rd 1st section (a) about “is forbidden the subsidy” is suitable for Brazil. the technical panel therefore believed that Brazil gives the interest rate balanced subsidy according to the PROEX plan to the domestically produced airplane export is one kind of export subsidy, this with "Counter-Subsidy Agreement" 3rd is inconsistent. according to "Forgiveness" the 3rd 8th section, the above PROEX interest rate balanced subsidy has harmed Canada's benefit, regarding this, Brazil has not rejected. 2. technical panel's suggestion: the Canada requests the technical panel to carry out on the survey result makes the concrete suggestion. However the technical panel thought that must according to "Counter-Subsidy Agreement" the 4th 7th section makes the suggestion, but is not other. Therefore the technical panel suggested that above Brazil abolishes the subsidy which immediately mentions. "Counter-Subsidy Agreement" the 4th 7th article of stipulation “the technical panel should assign one in its suggestion to abolish the subsidy the time deadline, if this subsidy were recognized that is one kind the subsidy which forbids”. When the technical panel assigns “immediately” the cancellation subsidy time deadline, possibly will consider the subsidy the nature as well as the execution suggestion difficulty. However the technical panel will assign “the cancellation” in the reality the subsidy to adopt the step aspect to lack the experience, the technical panel will not consider that will order Brazil when will carry out technical panel's suggestion to adopt any step. Therefore, the technical panel considered at the same time subsidy nature as well as regarding Brazil when execution suggestion will adopt any procedure; On the other hand requests Brazil “immediately” the cancellation subsidy, finally concluded that Brazil should abolish in 90th.

收起

太难了

机翻都辨别不出来。
自己找个地方翻吧别浪费分了。

1. Expert Group concluded that:
① Brazil on the export of China-made aircraft to give the PROEX interest rate subsidies to balance the "anti-subsidy agreement", a connotation of the subsidies, s...

全部展开

1. Expert Group concluded that:
① Brazil on the export of China-made aircraft to give the PROEX interest rate subsidies to balance the "anti-subsidy agreement", a connotation of the subsidies, subsidies that as the agreement Article 3, paragraph 1 (a), as provided for in export performance.
Brazil ② PROEX export of China-made aircraft to give a balanced interest rate subsidies are not "anti-subsidy agreement" Appendix I list of export subsidies that K in the first paragraph of the connotations of "permission" of subsidies.
③ Brazil did not follow the "anti-subsidy agreement," Article 27 paragraph 4, so the agreement Article 3, paragraph 1 (a) on "prohibited subsidies" applies to Brazil.
Panel of Experts therefore believe that, based on PROEX Brazil plans to export China-made aircraft to give a balanced interest rate subsidies is a kind of export subsidies, and this "anti-subsidy agreement," Article 3 is inconsistent.
In accordance with the "understanding" Article 3, paragraph 8, the PROEX balance the interest rate subsidies harm the interests of Canada, on this, Brazil has not dismissed.
2. Expert Group's recommendations:
Canada asked the Panel of Experts on the findings of the implementation of specific proposals. However, according to the group of experts that the "anti-subsidy agreement" Article 4, paragraph 7 to make recommendations, not the other. Therefore the Panel recommends that the immediate revocation of Brazil's subsidies mentioned above.
"Countervailing agreement," Article 4, paragraph 7 "group of experts in their proposal should be designated a need to eliminate the subsidy period of time, if the subsidies were identified as a prohibited subsidy." In the group of experts designated "immediate" withdrawal of the subsidy period of time may take into consideration the nature of the subsidies as well as the implementation of the recommendations of the difficulties. However, the actual designated group of experts in the "withdrawal" to take steps to subsidize the lack of experience, the panel will not consider an order to Brazil in the implementation of the Expert Group's recommendations on what steps should be taken. Therefore, the Panel of Experts on the one hand, taking into account the nature of the subsidies, as well as for Brazil in the implementation of the recommendations it will adopt procedures; Brazil on the other hand, require "immediate" withdrawal of subsidies, Brazil should be determined in the final 90 days of the withdrawal.

收起

得了 你还是叫个既懂英文 又会汉语的老外给你写吧!估计一会儿就搞定了!

你不会是把上段文字用于工作交差吧，那责任可大了！
难道商务部工作的人英语水平都不怎么样吗？！

1. Expert Group concluded that:
① Brazil on the export of China-made aircraft to give the PROEX interest rate subsidies to balance the "anti-subsidy agreement", a connotation of the subsidies, s...

全部展开

1. Expert Group concluded that:
① Brazil on the export of China-made aircraft to give the PROEX interest rate subsidies to balance the "anti-subsidy agreement", a connotation of the subsidies, subsidies that as the agreement Article 3, paragraph 1 (a), as provided for in export performance.
Brazil ② PROEX export of China-made aircraft to give a balanced interest rate subsidies are not "anti-subsidy agreement" Appendix I list of export subsidies that K in the first paragraph of the connotations of "permission" of subsidies.
③ Brazil did not follow the "anti-subsidy agreement," Article 27 paragraph 4, so the agreement Article 3, paragraph 1 (a) on "prohibited subsidies" applies to Brazil.
Panel of Experts therefore believe that, based on PROEX Brazil plans to export China-made aircraft to give a balanced interest rate subsidies is a kind of export subsidies, and this "anti-subsidy agreement," Article 3 is inconsistent.
2. Expert Group's recommendations:
Canada asked the Panel of Experts on the findings of the implementation of specific proposals. However, according to the group of experts that the "anti-subsidy agreement" Article 4, paragraph 7 to make recommendations, not the other. Therefore the Panel recommends that the immediate revocation of Brazil's subsidies mentioned above.
"Countervailing agreement," Article 4, paragraph 7 "group of experts in their proposal should be designated a need to eliminate the subsidy period of time, if the subsidies were identified as a prohibited subsidy." In the group of experts designated "immediate" withdrawal of the subsidy period of time may take into consideration the nature of the subsidies as well as the implementation of the recommendations of the difficulties. However, the actual designated group of experts in the "withdrawal" to take steps to subsidize the lack of experience, the panel will not consider an order to Brazil in the implementation of the Expert Group's recommendations on what steps should be taken. Therefore, the Panel of Experts on the one hand, taking into account the nature of the subsidies, as well as for Brazil in the implementation of the recommendations it will adopt procedures; Brazil on the other hand, require "immediate" withdrawal of subsidies, Brazil should be determined in the final 90 days of the withdrawal.

收起

楼主还是自己翻译吧,太长了

你以为你200分很大呀，完全是恶作剧！

干！
200分就可以翻译上面这一段了的话，那么百度的股价应该可以一股买一幢房子了。

Does not need translation every single word or phrase, but more completely recovers from an illness) technical panel's conclusion and suggested: 1. technical panel's conclusion is: ①Brazil the PROEX i...

全部展开

Does not need translation every single word or phrase, but more completely recovers from an illness) technical panel's conclusion and suggested: 1. technical panel's conclusion is: ①Brazil the PROEX interest rate balanced subsidy which gives to the domestically produced airplane export is "Counter-Subsidy Agreement" the 1st in connotation subsidy, the subsidy regards the export performance which this agreement 3rd 1st section (a) in stipulated to decide. ②Brazilian PROEX the interest rate balanced subsidy which gives to the domestically produced airplane export is not "Counter-Subsidy Agreement" the appendix export subsidy explanation data sheet K first section in connotation “permits” the subsidy. ③Brazil has not followed "Counter-Subsidy Agreement" the 27th 4th section of conduct, therefore this agreement 3rd 1st section (a) about “is forbidden the subsidy” is suitable for Brazil. the technical panel therefore believed that Brazil gives the interest rate balanced subsidy according to the PROEX plan to the domestically produced airplane export is one kind of export subsidy, this with "Counter-Subsidy Agreement" 3rd is inconsistent. according to "Forgiveness" the 3rd 8th section, the above PROEX interest rate balanced subsidy has harmed Canada's benefit, regarding this, Brazil has not rejected. 2. technical panel's suggestion: the Canada requests the technical panel to carry out on the survey result makes the concrete suggestion. However the technical panel thought that must according to "Counter-Subsidy Agreement" the 4th 7th section makes the suggestion, but is not other. Therefore the technical panel suggested that above Brazil abolishes the subsidy which immediately mentions. "Counter-Subsidy Agreement" the 4th 7th article of stipulation “the technical panel should assign one in its suggestion to abolish the subsidy the time deadline, if this subsidy were recognized that is one kind the subsidy which forbids”. When the technical panel assigns “immediately” the cancellation subsidy time deadline, possibly will consider the subsidy the nature as well as the execution suggestion difficulty. However the technical panel will assign “the cancellation” in the reality the subsidy to adopt the step aspect to lack the experience, the technical panel will not consider that will order Brazil when will carry out technical panel's suggestion to adopt any step. Therefore, the technical panel considered at the same time subsidy nature as well as regarding Brazil when execution suggestion will adopt any procedure; On the other hand requests Brazil “immediately” the cancellation subsidy, finally concluded that Brazil should abolish in 90th.

收起

1. Team of experts conclusion is:
1 to Brazil exports to the plane is the balance of interest subsidies PROEX countervailing agreement in the article 1 depending on the connotation of the agreemen...

全部展开

1. Team of experts conclusion is:
1 to Brazil exports to the plane is the balance of interest subsidies PROEX countervailing agreement in the article 1 depending on the connotation of the agreement, subsidies, paragraph 1, article 3 (a) specified in the export performance.
2 for domestic plane PROEX Brazil exports to the balance of interest rate is subsidies countervailing agreement appendix a list of items that export subsidies by the first paragraph K content of the "license" subsidies.
3 no follow the Brazilian countervailing agreement in paragraph 4 of article 27, therefore the agreement, paragraph 1, article 3 (a) about "banned subsidy" suitable for Brazil.
Experts argue that group, Brazil PROEX according to plan for export subsidies to balance of interest plane is an export subsidies, this agreement and anti-subsidy article 3 is not consistent.
According to the understanding of the article 3 of paragraph 8 PROEX rates, the balance the interests of the Canadian subsidies damage, Brazil, no rejection.
2 the suggestion: panel of experts.
Canada requires specialist group of the results of a specific implementation suggestion. However expert group that according to the agreement, countervailing article 4 to 7), rather than the other. So experts group above mentioned advice immediately revoked in Brazil subsidies.
The countervailing agreement article 4 7 "expert group in paragraph shall be specified in the recommendation of subsidies to revoke a time limit, if the subsidy was considered a banned subsidies. In team of experts designated "immediately" cancel the time limit, subsidies may take the nature and implementation suggestion subsidies. However expert group in actual designated "undo" subsidies steps in lack of experience, expert group won't consider to command in the Brazilian team of experts to take any step Suggestions. Therefore, expert panel on the properties of subsidies to consider in performing in Brazil and recommendation what procedures, On the other hand, "" immediately cancel requirements in Brazil, finally concluded that Brazil subsidies shall be revoked in 90 days.

收起

The expert panel conclusions and recommendations:
1. Team of experts conclusion is:
1 to Brazil exports to the plane is the balance of interest subsidies PROEX countervailing agreement in the ...

全部展开

The expert panel conclusions and recommendations:
1. Team of experts conclusion is:
1 to Brazil exports to the plane is the balance of interest subsidies PROEX countervailing agreement in the article 1 depending on the connotation of the agreement, subsidies, paragraph 1, article 3 (a) specified in the export performance.
2 for domestic plane PROEX Brazil exports to the balance of interest rate is subsidies countervailing agreement appendix a list of items that export subsidies by the first paragraph K content of the "license" subsidies.
3 no follow the Brazilian countervailing agreement in paragraph 4 of article 27, therefore the agreement, paragraph 1, article 3 (a) about "banned subsidy" suitable for Brazil.
Experts argue that group, Brazil PROEX according to plan for export subsidies to balance of interest plane is an export subsidies, this agreement and anti-subsidy article 3 is not consistent.
According to the understanding of the article 3 of paragraph 8 PROEX rates, the balance the interests of the Canadian subsidies damage, Brazil, no rejection.
2 the suggestion: panel of experts.
Canada requires specialist group of the results of a specific implementation suggestion. However expert group that according to the agreement, countervailing article 4 to 7), rather than the other. So experts group above mentioned advice immediately revoked in Brazil subsidies.
The countervailing agreement article 4 7 "expert group in paragraph shall be specified in the recommendation of subsidies to revoke a time limit, if the subsidy was considered a banned subsidies. In team of experts designated "immediately" cancel the time limit, subsidies may take the nature and implementation suggestion subsidies. However expert group in actual designated "undo" subsidies steps in lack of experience, expert group won't consider to command in the Brazilian team of experts to take any step Suggestions. Therefore, expert panel on the properties of subsidies to consider in performing in Brazil and recommenda