剑桥9小作文

篇一：剑桥雅思9_作文

TEST 1：Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.

Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

Traditionally, children have begun studying foreign languages at secondary school, but introducing them earlier is recommended by some educationalists. This policy has been adopted by some educational authorities or individual schools, with both positive and negative outcomes.

The obvious argument in its favour is that young children pick up languages much more easily than teenagers. Their brains are still programmed to acquire their mother tongue, which facilitates learning another language, and unlike adolescents, they are not inhibited by self-consciousness.

The greater flexibility of the primary timetable allows for more frequent, shorter sessions and for a play-centred approach, thus maintaining learners’ enthusiasm and progress. Their command of the language in later life will benefit from this early exposure, while learning other languages subsequently will be easier for them. They may also gain a better understanding of other cultures.

There are, however, some disadvantages. Primary school teachers are generalists, and may not have the necessary language skills themselves. If specialists have to be brought in to deliver these sessions, the flexibility referred to above is diminished. If primary language teaching is not standardised, secondary schools could be faced with a great variety of levels in different languages within their intake, resulting in a classroom experience which undoes the earlier gains. There is no advantage if enthusiastic primary pupils become demotivated as soon as they change schools. However, these issues can be addressed strategically within the policy adopted.

Anything which encourages language learning benefits society culturally and economically, and early exposure to language learning contributes to this. Young children’s innate abilities should be harnessed to make these benefits more achievable.

TEST 3: Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would hav little effect on public health and that other measures are required.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

1. A problem of modern societies is the declining level of health in the general population, with conflicting views on how to tackle this worrying trend.

One possible solution is to provide more sports facilities to encourage a more active lifestyle. Advocates of this believe that today’s sedentary lifestyle and stressful working conditions mean that physical activity is no longer part of either our work or our leisure time. If there were easy-to-reach local sports centres, we would be more likely to make exercise a regular part of our lives, rather than just collapsing in front of a screen every evening. The variety of sports that could be offered would cater for all ages, levels of fitness and interests: those with painful memories of PE at school might be happier in the swimming pool than on the football pitch.

However, there may be better ways of tackling this problem. Interest in sport is not universal, and additional facilities might simply attract the already fit, not those who most need them. Physical activity could be encouraged relatively cheaply, for example by installing exercise equipment in parks, as my local council has done. This has the added benefit that parents and children often use them together just for fun, which develops a positive attitude to exercise at an early age.

As well as physical activity, high tax penalties could be imposed on high-fat food products, tobacco and alcohol, as excessive consumption of any of these contributes to poor health. Even improving public transport would help: it takes longer to walk to the bus stop than to the car.

In my opinion, focusing on sports facilities is too narrow an approach and would not have the desired results. People should be encouraged not only to be more physically active but also to adopt a healthier lifestyle in general.

2. Nowadays how to improve public heath is a hot topic in society. Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. That's a good idea. The life lies in the movement. If there were more sports facilities which easy to reach are built, it will increase possibility that people do some sports, so that public health is improved.

our free were goingwatched TV or played computer at home. But after that supervisor of community decided to build some sports facilities for residents.

We can do something new rather than stay at home. That's the advantage.

However, some people say that: this would have little effect on public health and that other measure is required.

For some people, they don't like doing sport. Those sports facilities are no meaning for them. But on the other hand, everyone eats everyday; why not concentrate on the quality of the food. The reason is that some fake food emerges on the market, because of people's greed.

to many strange diseases. Thus we have to supervise it strictly so that people eat health food. There are even more ways to improve public health, such as limitation of tobaccos, make a difference for environment, better for hospital system and so on.

the best way, however it is a good way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities, there are also the other positive measures. We should depend on local situation, and then make the suitable plan. Our goal devotes to improve public health.

篇二：剑桥雅思4-9小作文题目分类汇总

题型1——Table（表格）

Cambridge IELTS 4

TEST 1:

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make

comparisons where relevant.

TEST 4:

The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make

comparisons where relevant.

TEST 2:

The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make

comparisons where relevant.

TEST 1:

The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make

comparisons where relevant.

题型2——Line Graph（线性图）

Cambridge IELTS 5

TEST 1:

The graph blew shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.

Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

篇三：剑桥雅思9真题及解析Test4写作

写作名师点题：

折线围主要考查以下几点:1.对析线趋势的总结描迷; 2.对复杂时间点的处理; 3.针对某些特殊点的描述。

雅思写作高分范文：

The line graph indicates the general consumption ofAmerican energy from 1980 to 2030. Uses of petrol and oil and coal see a drastic increase of about 15 quadrillion unites during the span of 50 years, while the other four energies

分开来讲，煤的使用稳步上升.有望在2030年直接增至3兆个单位，面后者(天然气)的使用量则大体上保持在2兆个单位，其中伴有小幅波动。

写作名师点题：

此类题目是近几年多次出现的考题，属于argumentative的立论型题。具体而言。题目的第一个要求To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?属于传统的片表达观点或现象发表看法并进行论证的形式。第二个要求则要对not important和will be easier之间的关系进行论证。

雅思写作高分范文：

It is undeniable that so many kinds of languages and dialects exit in the

multi-cultural world, which causes some complex and embarrassed situations while communicating with people holding different languages. Some predict that if some lesser-known languages vanish, we may enjoy a much easier lingual atmosphere. Personally I think it is entirely wrong.

Admittedly, to eliminate some languages that have been used in some certain parts of the world will make people's communication easier. Namely, English and other international languages will bridge over the lingual barriers to some extent. However, if a language disappears, the

culture behind it will not exist then shortly. Besides, the living habits and traditions relying on those language features will also die out with the loss of a language itself.

When it comes to the reasons for my disagreement, two aspects should be listed: for one thing, as mentioned above, language is no more than a way of communication. It is more likely to be a better symbol on special occas