英语翻译国外少数人主张偏激的动物保护观点,反对动物利用和反对使用实验动物,认为这样才能达到保护动物的目的.事实上这种观点是片面的,从本质上讲,这 并不能有效地保护动物.　　人类

英语翻译国外少数人主张偏激的动物保护观点,反对动物利用和反对使用实验动物,认为这样才能达到保护动物的目的.事实上这种观点是片面的,从本质上讲,这 并不能有效地保护动物.　　人类
英语翻译
国外少数人主张偏激的动物保护观点,反对动物利用和反对使用实验动物,认为这样才能达到保护动物的目的.事实上这种观点是片面的,从本质上讲,这 并不能有效地保护动物.
　　人类的生存繁衍破坏了某些野生动物的栖息地,造成这些动物的数量减少乃至濒临灭绝.
但是也应该看到,并不能把所有的动物消失都归咎于人类,比如恐龙,它在人类出现以前曾经统治地球,但是后来却灭绝了,人类没有施加任何影响.
动物的进化和消亡是大自然的规律,并不完全是人类的意愿和行动.
　　人类的活动确实有破坏自然、干扰动物消极的一面,但是动物保护是不可能 以牺牲人类自身的发展和前途为代价的.
企图停止社会进步来实现动物保护,是不现实的.
积极开发利用家畜、家禽之所以在数量、品种、遗传品质及生理性能等方面都在动物界占有绝对优势,完全是人类干预和积极开发利用的结果.
以鸡为例,所有的品种都来源于原鸡 ,它繁殖力不强,分布地域有限.
可是原鸡被人类驯养后育成了卵用、肉用、肉卵兼用鸡以及格斗用的斗鸡等,品种与数量之多,遍布全球,成为动物世界中最兴旺的物种之一.
麋鹿俗称 "四不像”野生种群在清代即己消失,少量在皇家花园圆明园中作为奇兽饲养.
经历八国联军的浩劫,幸存者在英国养殖,直至80多年后,得以重返故园,在江苏大丰及湖北石首建立的麋鹿保护区内繁衍生存,目前己形成一定数量的群体.
可以设想,如果没有人类的干预,麋鹿在自然界早已不复存在.
　　人类利用动物应该有所节制,滥捕滥杀对于那些繁殖力有限的动物肯定是灾难.动物一旦消亡,就不可能复生,也就谈不上为人类利用.
生活在青藏高原的藏羚羊 ,被偷猎者疯狂猎杀,取其轻柔的绒毛制取华贵的披肩;遨游在热带海域的海马,具有药用及观赏价值,被人们无休止地捕捞,以牟厚利.
人类由于利益驱动,不论高山之巅还是大海之渊,肆意捕杀,对动物和人类本身都是悲剧性的.

英语翻译国外少数人主张偏激的动物保护观点,反对动物利用和反对使用实验动物,认为这样才能达到保护动物的目的.事实上这种观点是片面的,从本质上讲,这 并不能有效地保护动物.　　人类
楼主 花了好长时间眼花的 水平有限 看着自己学习的份上给译了,有良心地给你有病吗?一分不给翻译那么长的文章?铁公鸡啊你!鬼才给你翻译呢!..

Foreign minority advocate extreme animal protection point of view, against the animals use for and against the use of experimental animals, so that to achieve the protection of animals for the purpose...

全部展开

Foreign minority advocate extreme animal protection point of view, against the animals use for and against the use of experimental animals, so that to achieve the protection of animals for the purpose of. The fact that this view is one-sided, essentially, this does not effectively protect animal.
Human survival and breeding of the damage done to some wildlife habitats, causing a decrease in the number of these animals and even on the verge of extinction.
But also should see, and not all the animals away are attributed to human, such as dinosaurs, it before the appearance of man once ruled the earth, but was later destroyed, the human did not exert any effect.
Animal evolution and extinction is the law of nature, is not entirely human intention and action.
Human activities have destroyed natural disturbance to the animal, the negative side, but animal protection is not possible at the expense of human development and the future for the price.
In an attempt to stop the progress of society to realize the protection of animals, is not realistic.
The active development and utilization of livestock, poultry is in quantity, variety, genetic quality and physiological properties and other aspects in the animal kingdom has absolutely advantage, entirely human intervention and exploiting the results.
Using the chicken as an example, all varieties are derived from the gallus, its fecundity is not strong, geographical distribution limited.
But gallus domesticated by humans after incubation of eggs with meat, eggs, meat and chicken as well as fighting for cockfighting, variety and number, all over the world, become the animal world the most prosperous one of species.
Elk, commonly known as" moose" wild populations in the Qing Dynasty that has disappeared, a few in the Royal Garden of Old Summer Palace as a rare animal breeding.
Experience of Holocaust survivors in the Eight-Power Allied forces, British culture, until 80 years later, was able to return to hometown, in Jiangsu Dafeng and Hubei city to establish the elk protection area of survival, at present has formed a number of groups.
Can imagine, if there is no human intervention, the milu deer in nature does not exist any longer.
The human use of animals should be moderated, over the killing of those fecundity limited animal must be disaster. Once the extinction of animals, would not be resurrected, also do not talk to go up for human use.
Living in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Tibetan antelope, wild hunted by poachers, the soft fluff of luxurious shawl; travel in the tropical waters of the hippocampus, a medicinal and ornamental value, be it endless fishing, to seek profits.
Humans as a result of the interest drive, regardless of the mountains or the sea of yuan, to kill, to animals and humans themselves are tragic.

收起

Few people outside the animal protection advocates extreme views against animal use, and against the use of experimental animals, that in order to achieve the purpose of protecting animals. In fact th...

全部展开

Few people outside the animal protection advocates extreme views against animal use, and against the use of experimental animals, that in order to achieve the purpose of protecting animals. In fact this view is one-sided, in essence, this does not effectively protect the animal.
Destruction of human beings to survive and multiply some wildlife habitat, resulting in fewer of these animals and even endangered.
But it should be noted, not all animals can disappear are attributable to human, such as dinosaurs, which once ruled the earth before humans appeared, but later became extinct, humans do not exert any influence.
Animal evolution and extinction is the law of nature is not entirely human will and action.
Destruction of human activity does have natural, animal interference negative side, but not at the expense of animal protection is the development of human beings and the future for the price.
An attempt to stop the animal protection society to achieve progress, is unrealistic.
Actively develop the use of livestock, poultry reason why the number of species, genetic quality and physical performance, etc. are an absolute advantage in the animal world, is entirely a positive development and utilization of human intervention and results.
Chicken, for example, all species are derived from the raw chicken, it is not strong fertility, geographic distribution is limited.
But after the original domesticated chickens bred by humans using eggs, meat, chicken meat and eggs either fighting with the cock-fighting, etc., variety and sheer number, all over the world, to become the world's animal species in one of the most prosperous.
Elk commonly known as "grotesque" wild populations that have disappeared in the Qing Dynasty, a small garden at the Royal Summer Palace as a strange animal husbandry.
Experience of the Boxer Rebellion in catastrophe, the survivors in the UK farming until 80 years later, to return to their hometown, Dafeng, Jiangsu and Hubei in the establishment of the first stone reproduction of elk to survive in protected areas, currently has a certain number of groups.
Can imagine that if there is no human intervention, elk in nature are long gone.
Human use of animals should be restrained, fishing killing of animals for those with limited fecundity is certainly a disaster. Once the animals die, it is impossible to revive, not to mention for human use.
Living in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Tibetan antelope, hunted by poachers crazy, whichever Preparation of soft luxurious plush shawl; swimming in tropical waters of the hippocampus, with medicinal and ornamental value, be it fishing endlessly to Mu huge profits.
As the interests of human-driven, regardless of the mountain top or the deep sea, wanton killing of animals and humans themselves are tragic.

收起