一道SAT语法题!（if every one would have contributed),we might have raised enough money to save the old landmark from developers.我选的是：if there was a contribution from everyone.正确答案是个不顺嘴的：Had everyone contributed.

来源：学生作业帮助网 编辑：作业帮 时间：2024/11/15 17:57:00

一道SAT语法题!（if every one would have contributed),we might have raised enough money to save the old landmark from developers.我选的是：if there was a contribution from everyone.正确答案是个不顺嘴的：Had everyone contributed.
一道SAT语法题!
（if every one would have contributed),we might have raised enough money to save the old landmark from developers.
我选的是：if there was a contribution from everyone.正确答案是个不顺嘴的：Had everyone contributed.
书上说我的选择太passive,（太消极?） 为什么我的不对那个不顺嘴的却对了?

一道SAT语法题!（if every one would have contributed),we might have raised enough money to save the old landmark from developers.我选的是：if there was a contribution from everyone.正确答案是个不顺嘴的：Had everyone contributed.
虚拟语气中,当从句有were 和had时,是可以把had were提前,去掉if来倒装的,
正确答案用的就是虚拟语气的倒装形式,平常确实不怎么见到.
正过来说应该是：If everyone had contributed(过去完成）,we might……（might\would\could\should加have done 的形式)
有had把 had提前,去掉if：Had everyone contributed,we might……
你选的,首先,contribution 是抽象动词,SAT中,抽象动词永远不如直接用它的动词形式；其次,那个passive,指的是你没有用everyone 作主语,动作不是由人发出的,不够主动,用OG上的话来说,就是：“change the subject unnecessarily

一道SAT OC 语法题> 一道sat的语法题,解释 一道sat上的语法题 一道SAT语法题!（if every one would have contributed),we might have raised enough money to save the old landmark from developers.我选的是：if there was a contribution from everyone.正确答案是个不顺嘴的：Had everyone contributed. 一道SAT语法题.B选项怎么改? sat语法题ip 一道sat语法为什么错了 一道SAT语法IE题Every year,toy manufacturers gather groups of children into playrooms,observing their choices of toys (as predicting) which new products will becomethe most popular.为什么括号里的as predicting错了?是什么语法错误? 一道小小的sat语法题~Unfortunately,the opening of the new library complex, next September, delayed for several monthes construction difficulties.答案是C,为什么不对呢?应该改成什么?!O(∩_∩)O谢谢 SAT语法几道语法题 SAT语法句子改善题 一道SAT 的题 一道SAT 的题 这是一道sat语法题,想请问为什么不选A? 一道比较简单的sat语法题!With the LP,the United states acquired a 一道SAT语法题提干When chronological order is followed too mechanically,they are obscuringrather than clarifying important relationships.(E) If you follow a too mechanical chronological order,it obscures rather thanclarifies important relations sat语法, SAT语法.