Was __Peter,__played tennis well ,__helped the blind man cross the street?A.it; who; that B.which; that ; that C.who; which ; that D.it ; that; who我知道答案,但请告诉我为什么,__helped the blind man cross the street?
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/11/16 12:57:30
Was __Peter,__played tennis well ,__helped the blind man cross the street?A.it; who; that B.which; that ; that C.who; which ; that D.it ; that; who我知道答案,但请告诉我为什么,__helped the blind man cross the street?
Was __Peter,__played tennis well ,__helped the blind man cross the street?
A.it; who; that B.which; that ; that C.who; which ; that D.it ; that; who
我知道答案,但请告诉我为什么,__helped the blind man cross the street?
Was __Peter,__played tennis well ,__helped the blind man cross the street?A.it; who; that B.which; that ; that C.who; which ; that D.it ; that; who我知道答案,但请告诉我为什么,__helped the blind man cross the street?
A.it; who; that
原因:
首先,这是个强调句的否定形式,建议先改为肯定句:__ Was Peter,__played tennis well ,__helped the blind man cross the street
很显然,用it was +被强调部分+句子剩余部分,所以第一个空填it,最后一个填that
第二个空考的是非限定性定语从句,前面用逗号隔开,修饰某人,所以只能用who
选a,首先who played tennis well是非限制性定语从句,可以忽略不看,则整个句子是一句强调句。Was it Peter that helped the blind man cross the street?是不是peter帮助盲人过马路。
加上非限制性定语从句意思就是,是不是那个网球打的好的peter帮助盲人过马路?