英语翻译只要人工翻译哦!1)the intonation was rather unreliable;this was particularly noticeable in mm 1-8 where it was almost consistently sharp .There was a slight improvement from mm.9-15 the trill was well - executed .The quavers in m 12
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/11/16 04:37:19
英语翻译只要人工翻译哦!1)the intonation was rather unreliable;this was particularly noticeable in mm 1-8 where it was almost consistently sharp .There was a slight improvement from mm.9-15 the trill was well - executed .The quavers in m 12
英语翻译
只要人工翻译哦!
1)the intonation was rather unreliable;this was particularly noticeable in mm 1-8 where it was almost consistently sharp .
There was a slight improvement from mm.9-15 the trill was well - executed .
The quavers in m 12 were a little untidy .
Tone was well-projected ,although dynamic levels could benefit from more contrast .
2)Sharpened intonation was immediately obvious and soon became a serious detriment to the general quality of the music.
Once again ,dynamic contrast was not sufficiently demonstrated .
The slurs were fragmented and the dotted crotchets were erroneously shortened.
3)There was a similar problem here with regard to the intonation ; the opening bar (mm.5-8) were especially out of tune ,sounding closer to D major than D minor .
There was insufficient fluency in the double-stop passages from mm.13-20 as the second string was often omitted.
Sense of tonality was somewhat more stable from m.21 onwards,although a number pf errors further marred the perfo
英语翻译只要人工翻译哦!1)the intonation was rather unreliable;this was particularly noticeable in mm 1-8 where it was almost consistently sharp .There was a slight improvement from mm.9-15 the trill was well - executed .The quavers in m 12
1)the intonation was rather unreliable;this was particularly noticeable in mm 1-8 where it was almost consistently sharp .
There was a slight improvement from mm.9-15 the trill was well - executed .
The quavers in m 12 were a little untidy .
Tone was well-projected ,although dynamic levels could benefit from more contrast .
---1)音准不肯定(有时候准,有时候又不准的意思);在1-8小结的时候特别明显,偏高.从9-15小结开始有一点进步.震音处理得很好.
12小结里的颤声有点凌乱.
音调有很好的发出来,虽然力度变化可以更大一点.
2)Sharpened intonation was immediately obvious and soon became a serious detriment to the general quality of the music.
Once again ,dynamic contrast was not sufficiently demonstrated .
The slurs were fragmented and the dotted crotchets were erroneously shortened.
---2)音准很明显地变尖了,很快地损坏了音乐的质量.
再度,力度变化没有充分地被表现出来.
连奏是破碎地而且附点四分音符被错误地缩短了.
3)There was a similar problem here with regard to the intonation ; the opening bar (mm.5-8) were especially out of tune ,sounding closer to D major than D minor .
There was insufficient fluency in the double-stop passages from mm.13-20 as the second string was often omitted.
Sense of tonality was somewhat more stable from m.21 onwards,although a number pf errors further marred the perfo
---3)音准还是相似地发生了问题;开始的小结(5-8)里面特别的走音,听起来比D小调更像D大调.
13-20小结里的双停小段有不够的流畅,第二条弦常被遗漏.
从21小结开始音准开始比较稳定,虽然-------
3)的英文部分没写完的样子.所以不能翻译:\
你是拉小提琴的吧?
我也是学音乐的~可是是在美国.
所以这些专业术语我查了很久呢:P
音乐加油哦!我能明白音准的问题=.=