英语辩论赛 man-made disaster is more horrible than natural disaster~正方论据

英语辩论赛 man-made disaster is more horrible than natural disaster~正方论据
英语辩论赛 man-made disaster is more horrible than natural disaster~正方论据

英语辩论赛 man-made disaster is more horrible than natural disaster~正方论据
慢慢看.
Not long after “man will conquer nature” slogan also with today “awe nature” equally fashionable,Great Leap Forward age nobody has suspected its accuracy nearly.Until today,after we suffer the multiple setback,only then realizes “the man will conquer nature” thought one-sidedness.Today,when our public opinion unanimously denounces “the man will conquer nature” slogan time,we cannot deny “the man will conquer nature” absolutely.The world myriad things are in survive,the development with in the nature other living thing competition.If any species have not defeated the competitor the courage and the strength,it on without doubt must by the nature elimination.Of a humanity himself as biology produces some kind to defeat all nature competitor the confidence and the thought that in fact is one kind “the man will conquer nature” desire.Has had this kind of desire to be wrong?On the contrary,because just had this kind of desire,only then had our humanity survival and the development premise and the power.Certainly,if one-sided thought that the humanity could “win finally the day” mistakenly,will make a mistake,must be defeated.On this spot,has a point is at least may determine that namely,the humanity is impossible to perpetuate,but the nature will perpetuate.From this spot said never will have “the man will conquer nature” result.However,in critique “man will conquer nature” thought time,we cannot deny that “humanity's history,is one from the realm of necessity,moves toward the free kingdom the history.Freely,we forever will not achieve that “the completely free kingdom”.But,we can therefore deny humanity's direction of advance in no way,gives up the humanity moving toward the free kingdom the endeavor.Therefore,although said “man will conquer nature” the slogan is wrong,but,has some kind of degree “the man will conquer nature” desire not wrong.Likewise,regarding the person and nature relations' another extreme,we may also say:“awe nature” the slogan is wrong,but,maintains to the nature the suitable awe is actually should.We approve of “maintains to the nature the suitable awe” the view.“suitable awe” the original intention should explain for such 3 points:1st,for the sustainable development use nature,we should protect the nature; 2nd,in the humanity transforms in the natural activity,must comply with the natural law; 3rd,the humanity to natural law's learning process,has not exhausted.Looked dialectically that maintains the moderate awe,was not equal to that certainly must awe the nature; Has defeats the natural determination and the desire,cannot represent “the man will conquer nature” the thought is correct.Should say that has defeats the natural determination and the desire and maintains to the nature the moderate awe is correct,however,absolute “the awe nature” and “the man will conquer nature” is the same,is one violent manner,is also one kind violates the science the slogan.Certainly,our public's thought and the public opinion propaganda have one kind of inertia,accepts some view in a time people ordinary practice,or is partial to some glossary.In the past we once quite worshipped “the man will conquer nature,defeats the nature” the slogan.Now,when we reconsider this slogan scientific time,also excessively many propagandizes “the awe nature” content.In fact,we (are specially scientific worker) should the dialectical analysis,regard these slogans.Should see:In processes person and in the natural relations,“the awe nature” and “the man will conquer nature” is the same,is one kind of violent slogan.We should learn to analyze the question comprehensively dialectically,cannot the light the frequency which appears in the news media judge the thing from some noun.