求高人帮我翻译一下下面几段英文法条In Re Olympian Each –Way Ltd (1994)UK, it was held that the language of the section confers the widest jurisdiction on the court as regards the parties against whom relief may be sought ;that in th

求高人帮我翻译一下下面几段英文法条In Re Olympian Each –Way Ltd (1994)UK, it was held that the language of the section confers the widest jurisdiction on the court as regards the parties against whom relief may be sought ;that in th
求高人帮我翻译一下下面几段英文法条
In Re Olympian Each –Way Ltd (1994)UK, it was held that the language of the section confers the widest jurisdiction on the court as regards the parties against whom relief may be sought ;that in the appropriate case ,relief may sought against a non-member ,or against a person not involved in the conduct complained of ;and that a person could be made a respondent even though no relief was sough against that person.1 The section provides orders which the court may make :1 to regulate the affairs of the company in the future .2 to provide foe certain shareholders or for the company itself to buy the share of other members .3to restrain the doing or continuation of come act.4 to authorize proceedings to be brought in the same of and on the behalf of the company against such persons and on such terms as the court may direct .5 to appoint a recover of manager of the whole or part of the company's property or business ,specify his powers and duties ,and fix his remuneration.6 the payment of damages and interest on those damages to any members whose interests have been unfairly prejudiced (this order was odded by Ord NO 30 of 2004 and came into effect on 15 July 2005).In Re Full Bullion Shipping Ltd the court held that the court had jurisdiction to appoint interim receivers under either s 168A or s 21L of the High Court ordinance (cap 4),and that the principles governing such discretion was adequate ,and the balance of convenience .These principles were established in American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd (1975).Chu J explained that interim receivers would not be appointed where there would e unreasonable delay ,no useful or practical purpose ,or if the appointment might prejudice the interest of those opposing such an appointment.If the court makes an order for the company to purchase its own shares ,provision will also be made for the reduction of the company's capital (see7.3).Where any of the above orders makes an alteration to the company's memorandum or articles ,the alteration will have automatic effect without any resolution from thecompany ,but such an alteration may only be alteration will have automatic effect without any resolution from the company ,but such an alteration may only be altered further with the consent of the court (s 168a (4)).a copy of any such order must be delivered to the Register within 14 days for registration 168a(4).Examples of orders made by the court include the following :In Re Harm Ltd (1959)UK, an order was sought to regulate future affairs (under a different provision, but the case still serves to illustrate the type of order which might be made ),where an 88-year-old controlling shareholder was given the office of governing director .The office was never defined ,but he ran the business of the company as if it were entirely his own ,ignoring the wishes of his co-directors ,his sons ,the resolutions of the board ,and the interests of the shareholders.
上面是出自《香港公司法》里面的节选.
请大家翻译完整哈，谢谢了哟

求高人帮我翻译一下下面几段英文法条In Re Olympian Each –Way Ltd (1994)UK, it was held that the language of the section confers the widest jurisdiction on the court as regards the parties against whom relief may be sought ;that in th
在Re奥海每个单程有限公司（1994年）英国,认为这是该节的语言赋予法院管辖权的最广泛的救济方面对谁可要求双方;,在适当的情况下,可能对一个寻求救济非会员,或对一个人的行为没有涉及的抱怨,并认为一个人可以作出答辩,即使没有救济是针对该person.1本节规定的命令,法院可以：1,规管飒飒该公司事务的将来0.2提供敌人部分股东或公司本身购买了0.3其他成员的份额限制或做来act.4继续授权程序将在相同和带在对这些人,并作为公司的条款,法院可以直接.5代表委任收回的全部或公司的财产或业务的一部分经理,指定他的权力和职责,并确定了他的remuneration.6支付利息损失和对T