动词后面没跟宾语,是vi还是vt?比如 it was said that no agreement had been reached 其中reach是vi...动词后面没跟宾语,是vi还是vt?比如 it was said that no agreement had been reached 其中reach是vi还是vt
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/11/17 00:43:15
动词后面没跟宾语,是vi还是vt?比如 it was said that no agreement had been reached 其中reach是vi...动词后面没跟宾语,是vi还是vt?比如 it was said that no agreement had been reached 其中reach是vi还是vt
动词后面没跟宾语,是vi还是vt?比如 it was said that no agreement had been reached 其中reach是vi...
动词后面没跟宾语,是vi还是vt?比如 it was said that no agreement had been reached 其中reach是vi还是vt
动词后面没跟宾语,是vi还是vt?比如 it was said that no agreement had been reached 其中reach是vi...动词后面没跟宾语,是vi还是vt?比如 it was said that no agreement had been reached 其中reach是vi还是vt
reach 是 vt..及物
因为这里有宾语是 agreement..
这里是被动形势.
如果是主动形式,又没有宾语在后面,那才是vi...不及物
vt.
忽略时态来看一个比较简单的句子“No agereement was reached”
实际上主动语态为“(people)did not reach agreement”显然“agreement”实际上是跟在“reach”后面的
一般情况下VI后面要加介词再加宾语,而VT后面直接加宾语,这里reach是VT
vi表示不及物动词,vt表示及物动词
不及物动词顾名思义,是动词后面不加宾语的,及物动词是动词后面加宾语的。因为reach在这里用了被动态,所以应该是及物动词vt。
vt