Given more attention,the trees could have grown better.为什么句首不能Having given
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/11/15 14:27:30
Given more attention,the trees could have grown better.为什么句首不能Having given
Given more attention,the trees could have grown better.为什么句首不能Having given
Given more attention,the trees could have grown better.为什么句首不能Having given
主语是the trees,前面的Given more attention,是省略了主语the trees
如果正常说的话应该是the trees are given more attention
give应该是用被动,Having given不能表达被动
given 是说给过了,只强调过去某一时给过。而having given 则强调不仅给过而且已经给完!
Given more attention,the trees could have grown better.中为什么不能用Having given?
Given more attention,the trees could have grown better.为什么句首不能Having given
应该是条件状语从句的Given more attention,the trees could have grown better.为什么用given
( )more attention ,the treescould have grown better.A.Given B.To give C.Giving D.Having given说出原因
7 .____ more attention ,the trees could have grown better .A .Given B .Togive C .Giving D .Having given
( )more attention , the treescould have grown better. A.Given B.To give C.Giving D.Having given说出原因
____ more attention ,the trees could have grown better .A .Given B .Togive C .Giving D .Having given
Given more attention,the tree could have grown better中为什么用过去式啊
Due attention Should be given
pay more attention
Due Attention Should Be Given to Spelling
Due Attention Should Be Given to Spelling
过去分词作状语与现在分词被动式作状语用法相同吗?如:Being given more attention,the trees could have g
pay more attention为什么能用比较级more修饰attention啊?
pay more attention什么意思
___more attention,the tree could have grown have grown better.A given B to give C giving D having given 答案是A这道题还原成完整句应该是if the tree had been given more attention,the tree could have grown better 那是不是改成Having
more time given 与given more time 有什么区别?
pay more attention to 和pay much attention to区别,