发光的不一定是金子有什么典故吗

来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/11/15 05:54:10

发光的不一定是金子有什么典故吗
发光的不一定是金子有什么典故吗

发光的不一定是金子有什么典故吗
1)Something attractive is not always what it seems,as in This house is really beautiful,but a close look will show dry rot near the foundation—【all that glitters is not gold】.Aesop stated the same idea in two of his fables (c.600 b.c.),and a version close to the current wording appeared in 1175.
2)The title line of the song,which essentially means "Everything that seems exciting or beautiful is not necessarily great or valuable",comes from the William Shakespeare line from The Merchant of Venice,"All that glisters is not gold; often have you heard that told." This in turn was a translation of a Renaissance-era Italian saying,which probably alluded to an ancient Greek fable attributed to Aesop
从以上解读看,该英语谚语的来源是《伊索寓言》.后来莎士比亚在《威尼斯商人》里使用了.

这是个山寨横行的年代。既然有“是金子一定会发光”,自然也就有你说的“发光的一定是金子”,其与“骑白马的不一定是王子”如出一辙。纯属玩弄文字,核心也不过就是正反逆命题罢了。

看你怎么衡量了,比如说项羽和刘邦,项羽最后战败自刎,刘邦成者为王。两者相比按说刘邦是金子,项羽不是。但是以项羽的文治武功,和一般人相比也应该算是十足真金了。