这两个句子是定语从句还是名词性从句,为什么?Farther was in the engine room ,where the third engineer was killed which was sunk in world War II
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/11/17 17:51:40
这两个句子是定语从句还是名词性从句,为什么?Farther was in the engine room ,where the third engineer was killed which was sunk in world War II
这两个句子是定语从句还是名词性从句,为什么?
Farther was in the engine room ,where the third engineer was killed
which was sunk in world War II
这两个句子是定语从句还是名词性从句,为什么?Farther was in the engine room ,where the third engineer was killed which was sunk in world War II
名词性从句,一般是充当主语、宾语或表语,也就是说,假如把它去掉,句子就不完整了.而定语从句只是用来修饰句子中的某个成分的,所以去掉的话,主句还是完整的句子.
所以Farther was in the engine room ,where the third engineer was killed 这个句子中,where引导的是一个定语从句,把它去掉,句子还是完整的句子.
第二个尽管句子不完整,但从意思来看,应该是一个定语从句?前面应该有一个先行词吧?
Farther was in the engine room ,where the third engineer was killed
定语从句
Farther was in the engine room, where the third engineer was killed which was sunk in world War II.
where 引出的是定语从句,先行词是 room,先行词在从距离做地点状语,用 where,或改用 in which;
which 引出的是定语从句,修饰 engine room 有点...
全部展开
Farther was in the engine room, where the third engineer was killed which was sunk in world War II.
where 引出的是定语从句,先行词是 room,先行词在从距离做地点状语,用 where,或改用 in which;
which 引出的是定语从句,修饰 engine room 有点不全面,考虑修饰的是比 the engine room 更大的船体,可能你的原句缺少了一部分。
收起