the government plans to bring in now laws___parents to take more responsibility for the education othe government plans to bring in now laws___parents to take more responsibility for the education of their childrenA to force B forcing

the government plans to bring in now laws___parents to take more responsibility for the education othe government plans to bring in now laws___parents to take more responsibility for the education of their childrenA to force B forcing
the government plans to bring in now laws___parents to take more responsibility for the education o
the government plans to bring in now laws___parents to take more responsibility for the education of their children
A to force B forcing

the government plans to bring in now laws___parents to take more responsibility for the education othe government plans to bring in now laws___parents to take more responsibility for the education of their childrenA to force B forcing
答案：B.
翻译：政府计划引入新的法律,(新的法律)迫使家长承担更多起其孩子教育的责任.
1）此题考查非谓语动词做后置定语的语法.
force parents to take more responsibility for the education of their children为后置定语,修饰laws.
考查law和force的关系,两者为主动关系,即“法律迫使/强迫.”,而不是被动“法律被迫使/强迫...”.
所以采用force的现在分词形式forcing.
2）如果采用不定式,则理解成“政府计划引入新的法律以迫使家长承担更多起其孩子教育的责任.”
根据句意,“迫使家长承担更多孩子教育的责任”的逻辑主语应该是laws,而不是the government.

B
现在分词做定语，修饰laws

选A
学语言要规范，句首大写，句尾标点，另外new错拼成了now
to这里表目的，翻译成“为了”。

the government plans to bring in now laws___parents to take more
responsibility for the education of their children
A to force B forcing
句子本来的结构是 主语 + 及物动词 + 宾语
...

全部展开

the government plans to bring in now laws___parents to take more
responsibility for the education of their children
A to force B forcing
句子本来的结构是 主语 + 及物动词 + 宾语
government + plans + 不定式作宾语
首先，现在分词作名词的后置定语的话，分词后面的句子的时态必须和主句的时态
一致。或者说两件事必须同时发生，很显然政府打算引入新的法律在前，而且只是
计划，而要实现“force parents to take more resposibility for the
education of their children.”这个情况，必须要在打算引入的法律真正引入
并实施后才可能发生。这是第一个原因，不能用分词。
第二个原因，那个选择B的解释里，有一句话说如果选择A to force, 那么就表示
“法律被迫使/强迫...”。这样理解是错误的，“to be forced” 才是不定式的
被动语态，才表示他所说的“法律被迫使...”。
第三，从逻辑主语的角度来讲，用 to force 完全可以表明其后句子意思的逻辑主
语是 law. 例如： He has somefriends to support her. 不定式的逻辑主语是
friends,而不是He. 将此例对比所问的问题，从句子结构和所表达的意思来看，
He 对应 The governments, has 意思上对应 plans to bring in, somefriends
对应 new laws, to support her 对应 to force to take more
resposibility for the education of their children. 很显然，问题中 to
force 后的句子其逻辑主语是 law, 不会理解为句子的主语 government.
第四，相比现在分词而言，不定式用在名词后做后置定语要更加常见。现在分词做
后置定语的情况较少。 即使有也是多用来修饰做句子主语的名词，紧接其后，而
不是用来修饰宾语或表语里的名词。例如：The man driving the lorry was
drunk. 另外一种就是， 现在分词作为说明性定语，放在谓语动词后修饰谓语。例
如： John sat in the chair writting. 注意，此句中 in the chair 是个状
语，现在分词 writting letters 是用来修饰谓语动词 sat 的，而不是做状语里
名词chair的后置定语。

下面是我和另一位网友交流时， A铜豌豆Z凡 的解释，她的解释：
我跟你想的一样用to force，但是我不否定用forcing。我只是觉得用to force更
合适。你说的做后置定语是从非谓语的角度来想的，而如果用forcing也可以从宾
补的角度来看，因为law和force有逻辑上的主谓关系，因此可以把forcing看成宾
补，用to force 那就是 the law is to force 如果用forcing那就是 the law
forces。从语法角度我觉得都说得过去。只不过我觉得用to force更合适，基表
将来也表目的

收起