动词后面加介词?补是说.不及物动词后面加介词,但后面要有宾语的么?这几个是怎么回事么?penguins are taken good care of in New Zealand.Young trees should be (a.taken good care.【a.taken good care b.take good of c.loo
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/08/28 23:34:59
动词后面加介词?补是说.不及物动词后面加介词,但后面要有宾语的么?这几个是怎么回事么?penguins are taken good care of in New Zealand.Young trees should be (a.taken good care.【a.taken good care b.take good of c.loo
动词后面加介词?
补是说.不及物动词后面加介词,但后面要有宾语的么?这几个是怎么回事么?
penguins are taken good care of in New Zealand.
Young trees should be (a.taken good care.【a.taken good care b.take good of c.looking after well d.well looked after】)
为什么一个加一个不加of呢?
however,his parents won't allow him to trains as much as he would like to.
为啥加to呢?
old people should be spoken to.为什么有to?
the teacher was reading when he came in未什么加in
与上面无关
i agree ( )what he said 这里使用in,on,还是with?
动词后面加介词?补是说.不及物动词后面加介词,但后面要有宾语的么?这几个是怎么回事么?penguins are taken good care of in New Zealand.Young trees should be (a.taken good care.【a.taken good care b.take good of c.loo
(别着急,希望我的解答令你的困惑烟消云散:)
一,关于“penguins are taken good care of in New Zealand.
Young trees should be (a.taken good care.【a.taken good care b.take good of c.looking after well d.well looked after】)
为什么一个加一个不加of呢?”
两个句子的of都不能少.即第二个句子的正确选项是d.well looked after,而不是你说的a.taken good care.
凡是(不及物)动词后面加了介词,所组成的动词短语,改为被动语态时,这些介词都要一一保留,不能删去.这是许多学生容易出的差错.
二,关于“however,his parents won't allow him to trains as much as he would like to.
为啥加to呢?”
这是简略句.像这类like to/would like to/would love to 等简略句,带有不定式,当要承前省略时,要保留不定式的标志to.楼主请看下面的对话:
---Tom,I am going to the theater this afternoon.Would you like to go with me?
---I‘d love【 to】.But I am have to stay at home to do my homework.
三.关于“old people should be spoken to.为什么有to?”
这个问题同“第一题”,不再累述.
四,关于“the teacher was reading when he came in为什么加in”
这里的in是副词,而非前面所说的介词,与前面所说的是两回事.come in 和come out 一样,可以单独使用而不用带宾语.这里省去in也通,只是意思不一样.come in 是“进来”的意思,如果没有in,就是“来”的意思.有in没in意思不同,看你要表示何种意思.
五,关于“ agree ( )what he said 这里使用in,on,还是with?”
with 是对的.agree with what he said 是“同意他说的话”的意思.
(如再有疑问,敬请垂询,)
可以接介词 也不一定接介词。
首先回答最后一个,with,赞成他的话
其次,take care of 那个选择题也是有of的,必须要有。答案是D
你总结得非常好,这些问题都是一类的,随便找个来说,old people should be spoken to。这个吧,我们把他换成主动语态,we should speak to old people。那这个句子变被动语态是不是就成了old people shoul...
全部展开
首先回答最后一个,with,赞成他的话
其次,take care of 那个选择题也是有of的,必须要有。答案是D
你总结得非常好,这些问题都是一类的,随便找个来说,old people should be spoken to。这个吧,我们把他换成主动语态,we should speak to old people。那这个句子变被动语态是不是就成了old people should be spoken to。我们怎么可以把to 去掉呢?其他几个都一样
收起
天哪,这么煎蛋你不知道?没好好听老师讲课吧!在被省略时只有to是留着的,其他介词是省略的,自己问老师不就可以了吗?在这里我说不明白的
这个问题很简单
1.答案应为d Young trees should be well looked after.
2.however,his parents won't allow him to train as much as he like to.这里to 不能省略,因为已省略了train.
3.Old people should be spoken to.这是被动语态的句子。主动语态应为We...
全部展开
1.答案应为d Young trees should be well looked after.
2.however,his parents won't allow him to train as much as he like to.这里to 不能省略,因为已省略了train.
3.Old people should be spoken to.这是被动语态的句子。主动语态应为We/People should speak to old people politely.
收起
问题1:第一个加了of是因为take good of是固定搭配,照顾,照料的意思;第二个没有加of是因为take good care是固定搭配,关心的意思,第二句的意思是:小树苗应该被呵护(关心)。这两个句子中的词组意思不一样,所以才会有一个不加of
问题2:1.加to是因为would like to do sth 固定用法,要加to,以后熟练了,学得多了,就知道,省略也可以的,得看是什么...
全部展开
问题1:第一个加了of是因为take good of是固定搭配,照顾,照料的意思;第二个没有加of是因为take good care是固定搭配,关心的意思,第二句的意思是:小树苗应该被呵护(关心)。这两个句子中的词组意思不一样,所以才会有一个不加of
问题2:1.加to是因为would like to do sth 固定用法,要加to,以后熟练了,学得多了,就知道,省略也可以的,得看是什么情况下;2.说话总得有个对象,英语语法也是一样,to在这里表示 对......说的意思;3.该句的意思为当他进来的时候,老师正在朗读,在英语中,进来是必须要加介词的,如果只是一个come,只表示进,一个动作的状态而已,并不表示结果,只有加上了in才能表示是进来
问题3:这里用on
顺便给你拓展一下agree的用法啊,这样你就明白了
agree with sb/sth/doing sth 同意某人/某物/做某事
agree to 表示一方提出一项建议、安排、计划等,另一方同意协作
agree on 表示双方意见达成一致(经过协商)
至于agree in 没有这个结构
希望我打的半天字能对你有所帮助
收起
加的是宾格,因为动宾结构