What's the more important IQ or EQ?需要一篇演讲,大学水平···大约2到三分钟···非常感谢···180到260词左右!

What's the more important IQ or EQ?需要一篇演讲,大学水平···大约2到三分钟···非常感谢···180到260词左右!
What's the more important IQ or EQ?
需要一篇演讲,大学水平···大约2到三分钟···非常感谢···180到260词左右!

What's the more important IQ or EQ?需要一篇演讲,大学水平···大约2到三分钟···非常感谢···180到260词左右!
应该是which is more important,IQ or EQ?
不要标题说出去就被人笑话了.
下面是我以前参考过的文章,也给你参考下吧.
While IQ (Intelligence Quotient) defines how smart you are,EQ (Emotional Quotient) defines how well you use what smarts you have.Peter Salovey,Yale psychologist and author of the term EQ,states that IQ gets you hired,EQ gets you promoted.He also suggests that it's important to redefine,in our complex world,what it means to be smart.In short,when it comes to "predicting future successes," brainpower,as measured by IQ and standardized achievement tests,may actually matter less than the character,or EQ of an individual.
Salovey tells of a simple test where four year olds are invited into a room and are given the following instruction:"You can have this marshmallow right now; or if you wait,you can have two marshmallows when I get back." Then,the researcher leaves.Some kids grab for the treat the second he's out the door,while others wait for the researcher to return.The results are recorded and Science waits for the kids to grow up.By the time the kids reach high school,significant differences appear between the two groups.The kids who held out for two marshmallows were better adjusted,more popular,more adventurous,more confident,and more dependable than kids in the quick gratification group.The latter group was also more likely to be lonely,more easily frustrated,more stubborn,more likely to buckle under stress,and more likely to shy away from challenges.When both groups took scholastic aptitude tests,the "hold out group" walloped the "quick gratification group by 210 points (the test scores range from a minimum of 200 points to a maximum of 800,with an average for all students of 500 points).
Did you ever wonder what happened to the smartest kid in the class who didn't end up being successful,or why some of your friends survive the greatest trauma while others crumble over minor issues?Perhaps it is because of differences in a person's EQ.EQ is not the opposite of IQ,and indeed it is hoped that people have generous quantities of both.But,there is little doubt that people without sufficient EQ will have a hard time surviving in life.
For five generations researchers have been discussing whether it's possible to raise a person's IQ.Geneticists say No,while social scientists say Yes.But while brain power researchers continue the debate,social science researchers have concluded that it's possible to improve a person's EQ,and in particular,a person's "people skills," such as empathy,graciousness,and the ability to "read" a social situation.Social scientists continually cite situations where experiences have modified a person's EQ.For example,educational researchers indicate that when normal students are introduced to disabled peers,those in the former group dramatically improve their ability to become empathetic and gracious.Additionally,the introduction of behaviourally disturbed students in a class of normal aged peers increases the ability of the latter group to learn to "read" social situations.A more profound improvement is frequently noted in the behaviourally disturbed student as well.
Social scientists conclude that EQ is perhaps best observed in people described as either pessimists or optimists.Optimists have high EQ and treat obstacles as minor,while the pessimistic low-EQ group personalizes all setbacks.In social research circles,high EQ denotes one's ability to survive,and it's here that there may be an overlap between EQ,IQ,genetics and environment.In this regard,I am reminded of the words of Darwin,"The biggest,the smartest,and the strongest are not the survivors.Rather,the survivors are the most adaptable." Those of us who survive and thrive in this complex world are not only the most adaptable,but also the most optimistic and the most likely to have a high EQ.

我正好有一偏研究论文，我给你修改了一下内容。太细节的我没说，我就拿了我里面的一个例子来说明EQ比IQ重要
It seemed high IQ help people's success in their career. However, if you couldn't restraint id and ego, high IQ is just nothing. Just imageine ...

全部展开

我正好有一偏研究论文，我给你修改了一下内容。太细节的我没说，我就拿了我里面的一个例子来说明EQ比IQ重要
It seemed high IQ help people's success in their career. However, if you couldn't restraint id and ego, high IQ is just nothing. Just imageine you're four years old , and someone makes the following proposal: if you will wait until after he runs an errend, you can have two candies for a treat. If you can't wait until then, you can have only one - but you can have it right now. This is a microscosm of the eternal battle between impulse and restraint, id and ego, desire and self control, gratification and delay.The ability to deny impulse in the service of a goal, whether it be building abusiness, solving an algebraic equation, or pursuing the Stanley Cup. As we can see, the role of emotional intelligence as a meta-ability, determining how well or how poorly people are able to use their other mental capacities.
这大概有150个子，你再添加一些自己的简单思想，或者总结的深刻一点，就以两句话就可以了。要都是我们给你的话，到时候你演讲都不知道自己再说什么了

收起