英语翻译Carrying capacity and populationCarrying capacity is usually defined as the maximum population of a given species that can be supported indefinitely in a defined habitat without permanently impairing the productivity of that habitat(19).A

英语翻译Carrying capacity and populationCarrying capacity is usually defined as the maximum population of a given species that can be supported indefinitely in a defined habitat without permanently impairing the productivity of that habitat(19).A
英语翻译
Carrying capacity and population
Carrying capacity is usually defined as the maximum population of a given species that can be supported indefinitely in a defined habitat without permanently impairing the productivity of that habitat(19).As environmentalists,we understand that we need to allow other species to continue to flourish on this planet.In practical terms,this means the allocation of significant areas of all representative ecosystems as national parks or equivalent reserves (20).
In terms of social justice,we must also ask how we can create the situation where all people have access to the resources needed for a dignified existence.The pivotal question is how can we do this without living beyond the world’s carrying capacity?
There is no doubt that there will be a limit to the number of people that the Australian continent can sustain into the indefinite future.However,it is premature to talk about ‘carrying capacity’ or placing limitations on population growth without first considering the more fundamental issues of resource consumption,equity between and within nations,and the ownership of the infrastructure that drives consumption.Given the integration of local economies into global markets,it is becoming increasingly difficult to determine what the carrying capacity of a single country might be.The concept of carrying capacity must therefore be re-considered,so that it takes into the account resource flows in the global economy.
Clearly,population growth can cause substantial ecological costs.Under the current high consumption,low density models used in Australia,more people does mean more impact.One example commonly used by those seeking a stabilisation of population is that of South East Queensland [SEQ],where low density urban sprawl is destroying remnant vegetation,coastal environments and previously productive agricultural lands.It should be remembered that much of this growth is driven by internal migrations from southern states rather than new arrivals to the country.In addition,a significant cause of ecological destruction is also occurring through the trend towards households with fewer people,rather than population growth itself.This is a common problem throughout Australia (21).But perhaps the most significant issue in SEQ is that we,as a nation,still allow low density,high resource-consuming urban sprawl of this nature to continue.While many see population growth as the key issue in situations like this,a holistic approach would recognise that this influx of people is occurring in an ecologically unsustainable manner – that is,impacts arise largely from the nature of the development,not simply because of the arrival of these people.
This is essentially a political and economic rather than an ecological issue,covering all levels of government,control over capital and the style of development.

英语翻译Carrying capacity and populationCarrying capacity is usually defined as the maximum population of a given species that can be supported indefinitely in a defined habitat without permanently impairing the productivity of that habitat(19).A
承载能力及人口
承载能力通常被定义为某一物种的可以无限期地在定义栖息地支持,没有永久损害,habitat(19) 的生产率的最大的人口.作为环保主义者,我们明白我们需要允许继续蓬勃发展,在这个星球上的其它物种.具体而言,这意味着所有代表的生态系统的重要领域作为国家公园的分配或相当于储备 (20).
在对社会正义,我们必须还问如何,我们可以创建所有人都有尊严的生存所需的资源访问的情况.关键问题是我们怎么可以这样不超过世界上承载能力的生活吗?
毫无疑问将是澳洲大陆可以维持到无限期的未来的人的数量限制.然而,言之谈一谈 '承载能力' 或限制放人口增长,没有第一考虑的资源消耗、 股本之间和内部,联合国和驱动器消费的基础设施的所有权更重要的问题.由于本地经济融入全球市场,变得越来越难以确定一个国家的承载能力的可能.因此,它考虑到在全球经济中的帐户资金流动,因此必须差饷,承载能力的概念.
很明显,人口增长可能会导致重大的生态代价.根据当前的高消费、 低密度模型在澳大利亚,使用更多的人不会意味着更多的影响.常用的那些寻求稳定人口的一个例子是东南部昆士兰 [SEQ],低密度城市蔓延销毁残植被、 沿海环境和以前生产的农业土地的位置.应该记住的是这种增长的大部分由内部迁移从南方各州,而不是新来港定居人士到该国.此外,破坏生态环境的一个重要原因也正在通过家庭的趋势较少人,而不是自身的人口增长.这是一个常见的问题,整个澳大利亚 (21).但也许 SEQ 中的最重要的问题是我们作为一个国家,仍然允许低密度、 高资源消耗继续这种性质的城市蔓延.尽管许多人认为人口增长,关键的问题,在这样的情况下,整体会认识到这的人涌入发生在生态上可持续的方式 — — 即,影响很大程度上产生发展的性质不只是因为的这些人的到来.
这是本质上是一个政治和经济而不是生态的问题,包括各级政府、 资本管制和发展的样式.

人口承载能力和
承载能力通常定义为某一特定的人口最多的物种,可以在一确定的栖息地支持无限期的生产率没有永久的损害,爱必居(19)。像环保主义者,我们明白我们需要允许其他的物种在这颗行星上继续繁荣。用实际的话说,这意味着相当大的地区的分配作为代表国家公园生态系统或同等储备(20)。
从社会正义,我们还必须问我们要如何才能创造这个情况,那里所有的人能接触到所需的资源有尊严的存在。最重要...

全部展开

人口承载能力和
承载能力通常定义为某一特定的人口最多的物种,可以在一确定的栖息地支持无限期的生产率没有永久的损害,爱必居(19)。像环保主义者,我们明白我们需要允许其他的物种在这颗行星上继续繁荣。用实际的话说,这意味着相当大的地区的分配作为代表国家公园生态系统或同等储备(20)。
从社会正义,我们还必须问我们要如何才能创造这个情况,那里所有的人能接触到所需的资源有尊严的存在。最重要的问题是我们如何能做到这一点不存在超越世界的承载能力吗?
毫无疑问,将会有数量上的限制,澳洲大陆的人进入不确定的将来,能维持的。然而,这是提前的谈论的承载能力的限制人口增长或放置不先考虑更基本的问题的资源消耗、公平之间以及国家之内,基础设施的所有权,驱动器的消费。给当地经济的整合进入全球市场,它的工作越来越难,以确定哪些的承载能力的单个国家也许会受到影响。承载能力的概念,因此,必须使它是否对规范进行重新审议加以账户资源流动的全球经济
很明显,人口增长会造成实质性的生态成本。在当前的高消耗、低密度模型在澳大利亚,更多的人意味着更多的冲击。其中一个例子常用的那些寻求稳定的人口是东南昆士兰的地方[有益],低密度城市扩张正在破坏植被、沿海环境和所馀剩的人以前农业生产力的土地。我们必须记住,许多这样的增长动力由内部迁徙,来自南部各州的而不是新移民的国家。此外,生态破坏的重要原因之一是通过趋势也发生家庭用更少的人,而不是人口增长本身。这是一个很常见的问题,在全澳大利亚(21)。但或许最重要的问题是,我们十分有益,作为一个民族,仍允许那些高能源消耗低密度,这种性质的城市扩张而继续。虽然许多人认为人口的增长,因为问题的关键在这种情况下,整体论是否认可,流入的人正在发生在生态不可持续的方式影响出现——那就是说,很大程度上是由大自然的发展,不是那么简单的,因为这些人的到来。

收起